Yet these early records in China and Egypt were not made at the
beginnings of agriculture in those countries. Plants were undoubtedly
cultivated centuries before it occurred to Emperor Chenming that rice,
wheat and other crops deserved ceremonial sowings. The pyramids of
Gizeh could only have been built by an organized, civilized people
with cultivated fields on which to levy toll for the dormant season
and lean years--pyramids could hardly be raised by a people forced to
skim a day-to-day existence from wild plants. "Art is long and time
is fleeting" in agriculture, and between the obscure beginnings of
this ancient art, when naked men following the chase began to vary a
meat diet with fruits, grains and roots plucked from the wild, and the
regular cultivation of useful plants, as implied by these old records
from China and Egypt, there are many steps and thousands and thousands
of years.
If, then, the history of the peach begins with the history of
agriculture, and the beginnings of agriculture are lost in the
obscurity of antiquity, it is useless to speculate as to how long the
peach has been cultivated. The statements of the early historians as to
the age of the domesticated peach are so at variance that they serve
only to confuse. Indeed, were we to attempt to bring into agreement the
diverse assertions of historians we should never know even the place
of origin of the peach; for it is upon data from botany that we must
depend most in determining the habitat of our fruit. This subject we
now come to discuss in detail.
THE ORIGIN OF THE PEACH
Names frequently breed misunderstandings and in the case of the peach a
fine brood of mistakes as to the origin of the fruit has come from the
name. As all know, "peach" and most of its equivalents in the countries
of Europe are derived from "Persia" and this has given rise to the
supposition that the original habitat of the fruit is Persia. The
ancient authors who mention the peach, as Theophrastus, Columella and
Pliny, agree that the home of the peach was Persia and, even until our
own time, to be written in any of these worthies is proof conclusive.
While negative evidence counts for but little, the notion is so firmly
fixed that some, at least, of the races of peaches are Persian products
that it seems best to clear the way for positive evidence by first
proving that the first home of the peach was not Persia.
Persia is pictured as a land of fruits before agriculture had begun in
Greece and Rome. The quince and the pomegranate probably originated
here and, with the olive, grape, almond, and, to the north at least,
the cherry and plum, have been cultivated from three to four thousand
years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account