Species are but convenient groups, their limits reflecting the
judgment of the species-maker. Were the authors of this text to
divide _Prunus persica_, the cleavage lines would be other than
those indicated in the foregoing paragraphs. _Prunus persica_ might
be divided, though there is no intention of furthering confusion
by the addition of new names, into two species. One would include
the white-fleshed, clingstone peaches, with large flowers and calyx
greenish-yellow inside; the other the yellow-fleshed, freestone
peaches, with small flowers and calyx-cups orange inside. Primitive
forms in China indicate such a division, the evolution of varieties
suggests it and the present disposition of the characters named as
separating these theoretical species attest the reasonableness of such
a separation. The primitive forms have been described and the descent
of varieties may be traced in the last two chapters, so that we need
only amplify the statement as to the present disposition of characters.
The characters in the two hypothetical species have been thoroughly
shuffled by hybridization but even if there is not correlation, as
there certainly is between color in calyx-cup and color of flesh,
it might be expected that those associated in the primitive plant,
the Adam of the race, would, despite the shuffling, still be most
often associated. What are the facts? In the Station orchard are
109 white-fleshed peaches; 40 per ct. of these are semi-cling or
clingstones leaving 60 per ct. nearly or quite free (there is
constant selection for freestones); 64 per ct. have large flowers;
all have calyx-cups yellowish-green inside. There are in this orchard
106 yellow-fleshed peaches; but 17 per ct. of these are cling or
semi-cling, the remainder being either quite free or nearly so; 73 per
ct. have small or medium-sized flowers; all have calyx-cups deeply
colored with orange inside.
Similarities in characters indicate so close a relationship between the
almond and the peach that one might well suspect many hybrids between
the two. Yet there appear to be but few clear cases of peach and almond
crosses. Knight[169] reports crossing the two, the doubtful results
of which led him to believe, as we have seen, that the peach is but
a modified almond. Several such crosses are indicated in botanical
literature[170] but whether all refer to one or several supposed
crosses there is no way of knowing--probably to one. The almond blooms
so much earlier than the peach that crosses could hardly occur in
nature. A hybrid between the two from which could be evolved a
late-blooming almond is a consummation to be wished.
[Illustration: CHINESE FREE (Medium Flowered)]
[Illustration: CROSBY (Small Flowered)]
THE NECTARINE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account