The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politicsLion, Aline
Philosophy
The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politics
Lion, Aline
Italy -- Politics and government -- 1914-1945; Partito nazionale fascista (Italy); Political science; State, The
Going back to the definition of laws as _volitional_ acts concerning
classes of actions, Croce shows that the so-called laws of nature or
of grammar are no laws at all, because the act of will is lacking in
them. Neither is the jurist, quietly elaborating rules from cases, a
legislator. His excogitations will have to wait for a man of will, who
alone, and _sword in hand_, will endow them with the character of law.
On the other hand the so-called moral law, economic law, are no laws
at all inasmuch as they lack the element of class! “Will the good,”
“Will the true,” “Will the useful,” are all statements in which a
volition is expressed, but then the object of such will is invariably
the _universal_, whereas laws have for object something _general_; a
_class_, not a concept. In short moral law, logical law, or economic
law ought to be called principles instead of laws.
The character of laws being general and not universal, is perfectly in
keeping with their mutability; since actual conditions are constantly
changing. It is necessary to add new laws to the old, to retouch these
or to abolish them altogether. Philosophically speaking, there is but
one cause of changing the laws, viz., the will that in its liberty
produces the new law in new conditions of fact. The question whether
we should recognise Conservatism or Revolution as the fundamental
concept of practical life, does not concern Croce in the least. For him
every Conservative is also Revolutionary, since he is always obliged
to adapt to the new facts the law that he wishes to preserve. Every
Revolutionary is also a Conservative, since he is obliged to start
from certain laws that he preserves, at any rate provisionally, that
he may change others and substitute for them new laws, which he in
his turn intends to preserve. Cavour, to use Croce’s own example, was
a Conservative in respect of certain problems, and revolutionary in
respect of others, to such a degree that he seemed to the Mazzinians to
be a Conservative and to the clericals and legitimists a Revolutionary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account