The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to MenCowles, Henry
Religion
The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to Men
Cowles, Henry
Bible. Pentateuch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The law was specific on the point that human life must not be taken
on the testimony of one witness only――a plurality of witnesses being
required (Num. 35: 30, and Deut. 17: 6, and 19: 15).――――It was no
crime before the law to kill a thief breaking into a house by night
(Ex. 22: 2, 3). After sunrise, it became a crime of blood to take
his life――it being assumed that he might be caught and compelled to
make restitution, and that the peril to your own life and that of
your family is materially lessened. The law carefully guarded the
defenseless hours of sleep by night. If a thief in defiance of this
law played the burglar by night, he must run his own risk of death in
the attempt.
4. A very remarkable statute met the special case of a murder done
by unknown hands (Deut. 21: 1–9). The authorities from all contiguous
cities took up the case; measured carefully to fix upon the city lying
nearest to the bloody spot. Then the elders of that city were to take
a heifer never worked in yoke; bring her down into a wild, uncultivated
valley――the home of all weird and thrilling associations――and there
strike off the heifer’s head――the priests coming near and all the
elders of that city washing their hands over the headless heifer,
solemnly protesting――“Our hands have not shed this blood, neither have
our eyes seen it. Be merciful, O Lord, unto thy people Israel, and lay
not innocent blood unto thy people Israel’s charge.” “And the blood
shall be forgiven them. So shalt thou put away the guilt of innocent
blood from among you when thou shalt do that which is right in the
sight of the Lord.”――――The entire scene was well adapted to make the
impression that murder is no trifle, and that God held the whole people
responsible to some extent for the safety of every human life.
5. _Inexcusable carelessness_, followed by fatal results, was
punishable by law. A supposed case for a specimen appears in Ex. 21:
28, 29. The goring ox――wont to push with his horns――reported to his
owner but not “kept in” by him――killing man or woman――must be put to
death and _his owner also_, for his culpable negligence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account