The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to Men — John Shaqi
The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to MenCowles, Henry
Religion
The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to Men
Cowles, Henry
Bible. Pentateuch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
I am well aware that, to abate if not nullify the force of this
apparent absurdity, it will be said that along the actual line between
plant life and animal life, the vegetable and animal kingdoms are
actually brought closely side by side; that plant life shades off by
almost imperceptible stages till it comes so near to the lowest forms
of animal life that the dividing line is scarcely if at all perceptible.
This fact no scientist disputes. The real question turns upon its
purposed object or ultimate reason. Is it, as Mr. Darwin’s theory
assumes, to bridge over this dividing line and facilitate the march of
“genealogical descent with variations” across what else would be a bad
if not an impassable gulf?
This being the claim set up by Mr. Darwin, I answer――
(a.) The proper test of this theory is simple: Is there any “_march_”
here at all――_i. e._ any _progressive movement_ from one form of
vegetable life to another, from lower forms to higher, or as this case
seems to demand, from higher forms to lower, for along this dividing
line we have the lowest known forms of both vegetable life and animal?
Is this army of the lowest vegetable species and of animal life-forms,
down in this dark microscopic valley, really _on the march_, or is it
absolutely moveless and fixed? Are the flora on the vegetable side of
the line really, doffing their plant-life uniform and regalia, and
emerging on the other side of the line into fauna to swell the hosts
of animal-life forms? This it would seem must be the test for the proof
or disproof of Darwin’s theory.
(b.) But again, I would reply in this as in other points; Mr. Darwin
misses not so much the facts of nature as the ultimate reason of those
facts. What is the ultimate reason for the remarkable fact that the
plant kingdom crowds itself so closely upon the confines of the animal?
Not, I answer, to facilitate the transit of generations from the one
province to the other. Of such transit there is not the first shade
of evidence. But the reason is that the Great Author of nature out
of his infinite resources has _filled both kingdoms perfectly full
of life-forms_ so that no territory between their respective domains
lies unoccupied. It is simply a fecundity of life-forms or species,
analogous to the fecundity of living representatives under most of
these species――all alike traceable to the infinite resources of the
Creator’s wisdom and power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account