The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to MenCowles, Henry
Religion
The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to Men
Cowles, Henry
Bible. Pentateuch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
It is scarcely needful to speak of the physical means which God
employed to produce this flood. The agencies which appear in the
volcano and in the earthquake and which God holds imprisoned at no
great depth below the earth’s surface, are all-sufficient for these
results. We may suppose that they lifted the bed of the adjacent seas,
upheaving their waters into the atmosphere to descend in torrents
of rain, and sinking for the time the inhabited lands――and the work
is done. Such alternate upheavals and depressions are, we may say,
chronic to the crust of the earth. The ancient records of geology bear
this testimony. It was not strange therefore but was merciful that
God should allay human fears by his promise to drown the earth no
more. His bow in the cloud, seen when the sun shone forth after the
shower, became by God’s special appointment the sign and pledge of this
covenant.――――I see no good reason to suppose that the rainbow never
existed before. It must have existed by the laws of nature, unless
those laws were greatly changed at the flood――a change which should not
be assumed without sufficient reason. No such reasons are apparent. It
is better therefore to construe the promise――The well known bow in the
cloud I give and ordain to be my sign and pledge that the earth shall
be deluged with water no more.――――Beautiful symbol, kindly and lovingly
ordained; and as we look upon it, delighted with both its beauty and
its significance, let it heighten our joy that God says of himself,
“I will look upon it and remember my covenant.”
* * * * *
_Was this flood universal?_
1. Was it universal _geographically_, overspreading the entire globe?
2. Was it universal as to all _living men_, leaving absolutely none
alive on the face of all the earth, except those in the ark?
1. That the deluge was of limited extent geographically, and not
universal, may be fairly assumed on the following grounds:
(1.) The moral reasons for a deluge do not seem to require it to be
universal, since obviously that corrupt generation whose sins demanded
such a judgment did not overspread all the continents and lands of the
globe, but appear to have been confined within a quite limited area in
Western Asia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account