The People's Palace and the Religious World: or, thoughts on public agitation against the promised charter to the new Crystal Palace Company, and on "Sabbath desecration" — John Shaqi
The People's Palace and the Religious World: or, thoughts on public agitation against the promised charter to the new Crystal Palace Company, and on "Sabbath desecration"Layman
Religion
The People's Palace and the Religious World: or, thoughts on public agitation against the promised charter to the new Crystal Palace Company, and on "Sabbath desecration"
Layman
Crystal Palace (Sydenham, London, England); Sunday legislation -- Great Britain
SHALL the new Crystal Palace be open on Sunday? This question is
exciting a good deal of attention—especially in the religious world, and
is likely to attract more, ere finally set at rest. It is a question of
magnitude, and possibly of political importance. It becomes, therefore,
the duty of all who feel interested in its solution, to ascertain clearly
the facts upon which it is based, the principles with which it is bound
up, and the consequences which will flow from its decision. The occasion
seems to have been seized upon by what may be called the Sabbatarian
party, to make a determined stand on behalf of the principle for which
they have often fought and been vanquished—the right of the religious
world to impose their notions of Sabbath observance upon the community at
large. The particular point at issue may be readily decided by any
unbiassed mind, on examination of the actual facts. But the Sabbatarians
refuse to be bound down to the case as it stands. They exaggerate and
pervert the facts; and, under cover of the smoke and excitement thus
created, advance to a general assault upon what they term “Sabbath
desecration.” The design of the next few pages is rather to point out
the impolicy, danger, and hopelessness of any public movement to prevent
the opening of this place of recreation on the Sunday, than to advocate
or defend that step.
Although the facts of the case are conveniently lost sight of by the
agitators in question, they are really so important to a right
understanding of its merits as to admit of re-statement. It appears,
then, that the New Crystal Palace at Sydenham is in the hands of a
joint-stock company, and is to be conducted on the same commercial
principles as all speculations of a like character. Their object is
familiar to every newspaper reader. In brief, they propose to provide
for the people recreation and instruction of a kind not now within their
reach. If the programme be faithfully carried out, the project will
unquestionably tend to improve the health, enlarge the knowledge, and
refine the taste of the public. The Company have applied for a Royal
Charter of Incorporation, the effect of which, as is well known, is to
confine the liability of individual shareholders to the amount of their
shares. In making their application to Lord Derby, the Directors, we are
told by the _Times_, communicated to his Lordship the terms upon which
they proposed to open the building and grounds on Sunday. “They were of
opinion that until after one o’clock no trains should run from London,
and the Crystal Palace itself should be strictly closed. After that hour
they proposed to throw open the park and the winter-garden, but not to
exhibit those departments of the building which will partake exclusively
of a manufacturing and commercial character, the intention being to
devote a certain portion of the space to specimens of manufacture, &c.,
which the public will be invited, upon certain conditions, to display.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account