Since I have mentioned the name of Norfolk, let me say, that after
the Arab race, of all the foreign ones, the Norfolk trotter is the
one which seems to me to offer the greatest advantages in an alliance
with the Percheron. With both, good qualities and defects are diverse,
so that they can complete and correct each other by means of a wisely
combined and carefully studied connection.
The Norfolk horse has, it is true, an ugly head, and his eye is small
and destitute of expression; but his neck, with good lines, starts
well from his breast; his shoulder is fine and well-sloped; his chest
magnificent, and his girth enormous; his loins broad, well-sustained
and well-attached; his haunches long, his croup horizontal; his
buttocks well filled out and low; and his limbs strong, but not quite
free enough from fat; nor is his action always sufficiently stylish,
yet he has a quick and free gait.
Give to this horse a mare having a fine and expressive head, lighted
up with a large, intelligent, well-opened eye; let her possess lean,
elegant, and perfect limbs, and, a hundred to one, you will get a
valuable colt. But, with the Norfolk, as with all others, there are
degrees, and if I cross the Channel in search of a stock horse, I
should wish him to possess the following qualities:
This stallion should be rather large, have thick and strong limbs,
chest fully developed, the girth as great as possible, very heavy in
the hind-quarters, buttocks descending well, forehead broad and open,
and the eye large and expressive. He should be always shorter in height
than the mares, but quite as broad, and, I repeat it, as short-limbed
as possible, on account of an invariable, innate tendency of the
English horse to height and thinness. He should be neither cross, nor,
above all, affected with that nervous sensitiveness too common in the
English breeds. His action should be quick, well kept up, bold and
square. He should have, if possible, a decided and well-pronounced
color, either a dark bay or a chestnut. Breeding stock of his get
should be chosen under identical conditions, and then they would be on
a footing with him, although, logically speaking, there would be always
an inclination to prefer the type to the sub-type.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account