Indians of North America -- Religion; Indians of North America -- Rites and ceremonies; Peyotism
Areal contrasts in minor points are no less striking. Dancing was
conspicuous in Mexico, less important transitionally, and on the whole
lacking in the Plains. Painting of a symbolic nature was ritually
significant in Mexico; in the Plains individual styles were dictated
by peyote visions. Peyotism in Mexico is a seasonal matter, but in the
Plains the rite occurs the year around (in the south the trip for peyote
may have been associated more with the ritual salt pilgrimage, in the
north with the ritualized war journeys; parallels are also suggested in
the Maricopa ritualized mountain-sheep hunting and Navaho deer hunting).
In Mexico peyote was a tribal affair and women participated on equal
terms with the men in dancing, etc. In Mescalero, women were excluded
from meetings, as in the Plains also originally. The rite was held
principally outdoors in Mexico, and in a tipi transitionally and in the
Plains—a patio arrangement in Mexico, and an altar centering around
the “moon” in the Plains. Ritual racing and ball games[124] are part
of Mexican peyotism, but not elsewhere. Smoking is inconspicuous in
Mexico, but in the Plains it has been important enough to involve church
schisms.[125] Huichol peyote had no drum, though elsewhere in Mexico a
wooden drum was used, while in the Plains the water-drum (intrusive from
the Southwest) is universal. The rasp is Mexican, but the Plains rite has
the gourd rattle and eagle wing-bone whistle in addition to the drum. The
“staff” is a special problem in the Plains.
The Huichol and Tarahumari have a squirrel fetish in addition to the
fetish plant; the Plains have only the latter. Ceremonial drunkenness
with tesvino, etc., is an integral part of Mexican “curing”; in the
Plains peyote and alcohol are so far mutually exclusive that the familiar
propaganda calls the first a specific against the second. The alleged
aphrodisiac virtue of peyote is a Mexican belief; but curiously enough
in Mexico, where many “peyotes” were said by natives to be aphrodisiac,
Lumholtz pronounced _Lophophora williamsii_ definitely anaphrodisiac;
while in the Plains, where the natives most strenuously deny this virtue
for peyote, enemies of the cult most consistently claim that it produces
aphrodisiac orgies.[126]
In Mexico the shaman alone sings, though his assistants may “spell”
him; in the Plains all male participants drum and rattle. In Mescalero,
though the drum circles the tipi, the staff and gourd remain with the
leader. Finally, Mexican and Mescalero peyotism are almost wholly free
of Christian elements; so too were the early Plains rites diffusing from
the Kiowa-Comanche, though in the John Wilson rite, the Oto Church of
the First-born (and its successor, the Native American Church) and the
Winnebago Rave-Hensley variant, Christian symbolism and interpretations
are frequent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account