The Phase Rule and Its ApplicationsFindlay, Alexander
Science
The Phase Rule and Its Applications
Findlay, Alexander
Chemistry, Physical and theoretical; Phase rule and equilibrium; Solution (Chemistry)
Another class of dimorphous substances is, however, met with as, for
instance, in the case of the well-known compounds iodine monochloride and
benzophenone. Each crystalline form has its own melting point, the
dimorphous forms of iodine monochloride melting at 13.9° and 27.2°,[63] and
those of benzophenone at 26° and 48°.[64] This class of substance differs
from that which we have already studied (_e.g._ sulphur and tin), in that
at all temperatures up to the melting point, only one of the forms is
stable, the other being metastable. There is, therefore, no transition
point, and transformation of the crystalline forms can be observed _only in
one direction_. These two classes of phenomena are distinguished by the
names _enantiotropy_ and _monotropy_; enantiotropic substances being such
that the change of one form into the other is a reversible process (_e.g._
rhombic sulphur into monoclinic, and monoclinic sulphur into rhombic), and
monotropic substances, those in which the transformation of the crystalline
forms is irreversible.
[Illustration: FIG. 8.]
[Illustration: FIG. 9.]
These differences in the behaviour can be explained very well in many cases
by supposing that in the case of enantiotropic substances the transition
point lies below the melting point, while in the case of monotropic
substances, it lies above the melting point.[65] These conditions would be
represented by the Figs. 8 and 9.
In these two figures, O_{3} is the transition point, O_{1} and O_{2} the
melting points of the metastable and stable forms {45} respectively. From
Fig. 9 we see that the crystalline form I. at all temperatures up to its
melting point is metastable with respect to the form II. In such cases the
transition point could be reached only at higher pressures.
Although, as already stated, this explanation suffices for many cases, it
does not prove that in all cases of monotropy the transition point is above
the melting point of the two forms. It is also quite possible that the
transition point may lie below the melting points;[66] in this case we have
what is known as _pseudomonotropy_. It is possible that graphite and
diamond,[67] perhaps also the two forms of phosphorus, stand in the
relation of pseudomonotropy (_v._ p. 49).
The disposition of the curves in Figs. 8 and 9 also explains the phenomenon
sometimes met with, especially in organic chemistry, that the substance
first melts, then solidifies, and remelts at a higher temperature. On again
determining the melting point after re-solidification, only the higher
melting point is obtained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account