The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 08 of 55: 1591-1593; Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, as Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 08 of 55: 1591-1593; Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, as Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
The second ground, as I said, of a righteous war is the self-defense
of the prince or of his subjects. This ground also is matter of both
natural and divine right; for even as self-defense is a natural
right, on which right is founded the rule of _vim vi repellere_,
so too in the prince is the defense of his subjects--for the care
which the prince has of his subjects is as essential on his part as
is the care which each one of them has for himself; hence, if the
subjects are aggrieved by their enemies, the prince may justly in
their defense make war, and _vim vi repellere_. This is much better
than that the individual should himself avenge the wrong; for the
individual can lawfully defend himself and his property only _in
continente_, as Sylvester declares (_Bellum_, 2 § 3), but he may not
avenge past wrongs, _nec sua repetere_ save by recourse to his judge
and superior. [17] Whatever goes beyond that is contrary to law and
good government and, as Cajetan says, is _extra moderamen tutelæ_,
[18] it being an essential condition of the right _vim vi repellere_
that it be done _cum moderamine_. But the prince and the state have the
same authority with respect to their enemies at whose hands they have
suffered injury, which they have with regard to their own subjects;
and hence not only may they defend themselves lest either they or their
subjects suffer injury, but they may avenge injuries by inflicting
punishment, exact satisfaction for damage done, and take the enemies'
lives, if so the quiet and safety of their subjects require. Under this
head come the many wars waged by King David against the Philistines,
mentioned in the Scriptures; as also the war of the Machabee captains
against the kings Antiochus and Demetrius.
The third cause and ground is rebellion and disobedience of
subjects. This was the ground of David's war with Sheba, son of Bichri,
who raised a revolt, as you may read in II Sam. 20; [19] and this is
what St. Augustine says (_Contra Faustum Manichæum_, I. 22, c. 74):
_Adversus violentiam resistentium sive deo sive aliquo legitimo imperio
jubente gerenda ipsa bella suscipiuntur a bonis ubi eos vel jubere
tale aliquid vel in talibus obedire juste ordo ipse constringit_
(in c. _Quid culpatur, ubi supra_.) [20]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account