The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 08 of 55: 1591-1593; Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, as Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 08 of 55: 1591-1593; Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, as Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
The fourth cause and ground for a righteous war is when there is
default of keeping faith or carrying out agreements; for in such
case the party who has been wronged may lawfully make war on him
who, by not keeping faith, has done him injury. This made Joran
[Jehoram], king of Israel, wage war on Mesa [Mesha], king of Moab,
for his having failed to keep the agreements and to pay the tribute
which he had promised to pay to his suzerain, King Ahab; and that
this war was just is clear, for that he was assisted therein by the
holy and righteous Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, with the approval of
the prophet Elisha--who in the name of the Lord urged them on to war,
and promised them a sure victory--as is seen in II Sam. ch. 3. These
four causes and grounds, or any one of them by itself, justify war;
and there are other grounds also, but these are the most certain and
the most applicable to the matter in hand.
The third condition which, as we have said, must be fulfilled to
make a war righteous is a right intention on the part of him who
wages it; because, failing this, even when the other two conditions
concur--to wit, authority and just cause--a faulty intention may
render and does render the war unjust. This condition is also laid
down by St. Augustine (_Contra Faustum_), and he is quoted by Gratian
(in c. _Quid culpatur_); and as his words are of great weight and
define wherein a bad intention consists, it is well to quote them:
_Quid culpatur in bello? an quid moriuntur quandoque morituri ut
dominentur in pace victuri? Hoc reprehendisse timidorum est non
religiosorum. Nocendi cupiditas, ulciscendi crudelitas, impacatus
atque implacabilis animus, feritas rebellandi, libido dominandi et
si quae sunt similia: haec sunt quae in bellis jure culpantur_. [21]
And what must be the right intention of the prince in levying war
the same Augustine declares in the book _De Verbo Domini_; and the
passage is found in c. _A pud, ubi supra: Apud veros dei cultores et
ipsa bella peccata non sunt quae non cupiditate aut crudelitate sed
pacis studio geruntur ut mali coerceantur et boni subleventur_. [22]
Peace is the end that is to be sought in war, and so saith Aristotle
(lib. 10 _Ethicorum_): _Bellum gerimus ut in pace degamus_. [23]
And Augustine says the same (_Epist. ad Bonifacium_): _Non quaeritur
pax ut bellum exerceatur, sed bellum geritur ut pax acquiratur._ [24]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account