The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 25 of 55: 1635-36; Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, As Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898 — Volume 25 of 55: 1635-36; Explorations by Early Navigators, Descriptions of the Islands and Their Peoples, Their History and Records of the Catholic Missions, As Related in Contemporaneous Books and Manuscripts, Showing the Political, Economic, Commercial and Religious Conditions of Those Islands from Their Earliest Relations with European Nations to the Close of the Nineteenth Century
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
After the feast of the Holy Ghost, on the following Wednesday, May 14,
it appears that the three orders of St. Dominic, St. Francis, and the
Recollects, determined to observe the interdict and the suspension of
divine services. Consequently, they did not open their churches; and,
although they opened them later, the altars were draped in mourning,
and they did not say mass. On the contrary, they gave out that it was
a mortal sin to hear it, for the interdict and the prohibition to say
mass could not be raised. These were observed so strictly that the
religious did not ring their bells at the Ave Marias or at the Animas,
as usual, as if that were a prohibited action. That shows that it was
not devotion but fear, as the other Portuguese said. [78] But I ask
those fathers, if it could not be removed, why did they ring their
bells at midnight on Saturday, and why, during the three days of the
feast of the Holy Ghost, the doors of their churches were open while
they said mass, and celebrated the other divine offices? For to say
that that feast is privileged by law, like Corpus Christi day, was
correctly stated when there is only an interdict, but not when there
is a suspension of mass--as is the common opinion of the doctors and
the general practice. Thus that is demonstrated; besides which, if
the cathedral and the other secular churches have lifted the interdict
and the suspension of divine services, the religious were obliged to
follow the action of the mother-church, according to a Clementina that
has been cited to me. Thus the fathers of St. Augustine and those of
the Society acted very prudently, in concurring with the cathedral.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account