The Philistine: a periodical of protest (Vol. III, No. 2, July 1896) — John Shaqi
The Philistine: a periodical of protest (Vol. III, No. 2, July 1896)Various
General
The Philistine: a periodical of protest (Vol. III, No. 2, July 1896)
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; American periodicals; Society of the Philistines (East Aurora, N.Y.) -- Periodicals
Now is it a correct criticism of the book to complain, as one writer has
done, that it does not dwell studiously on the higher aspects of the
war? Let the picture only be well drawn, and the moral will take care of
itself; never fear. The book is not a patriotic tract, but a delineation;
a cross section of the daily existence of the raw enlisted-man. In other
respects it is reticent, because it is truthful. Does any one suppose
that in the daily routine of the camp there was room for much fine talk
about motives and results—that men were constantly appealing, like
Carlyle’s Frenchman, “to posterity and the immortal Gods?” Fortunately
or unfortunately, the Anglo Saxon is not built that way; he errs on the
other side; habitually understates instead of overstating his emotions;
and while he is making the most heroic sacrifices of his life, usually
prefers to scold about rations or grumble at orders. He is to be
judged by results; not by what he says, which is often ungracious and
unornamental, but by what he does.
The very merit of this book is that in dealing with his men the
author offers, within this general range, all the essential types of
character—the man who boasts and the man who is humble—the man who
thinks he may be frightened and is not, and the man who does not expect
to be, but is. For his main character he selects a type to be found
in every regiment—the young man who does not know himself, who first
stumbles into cowardice, to his own amazement, and then is equally amazed
at stumbling into courage; who begins with skulking, and ends by taking
a flag. In Doyle’s _Micah Clarke_ the old Roundhead soldier tells his
grandchildren how he felt inclined to bob his head when he first heard
bullets whistle, and adds “If any soldier ever told you that he did not,
the first time that he was under fire, then that soldier is not a man
to trust.” This is putting it too strongly, for some men are born more
stolid, other more nervous; but the nervous man is quite as likely to
have the firmer grain, and to come out the more heroic in the end. In my
own limited experience, the only young officer whom I ever saw thoroughly
and confessedly frightened, when first under fire, was the only one of
his regiment who afterwards chose the regular army for his profession,
and fought Indians for the rest of his life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account