The Philistine : $b a periodical of protest (Vol. II, No. 3, February 1896)Various
General
The Philistine : $b a periodical of protest (Vol. II, No. 3, February 1896)
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; American periodicals; Society of the Philistines (East Aurora, N.Y.) -- Periodicals
In Literature he is a Philistine who seeks to express his personality in
his own way. A true Philistine is one who brooks no let nor hindrance
from the tipstaffs of letters, who creating nothing themselves yet are
willing for a consideration to show others how. These men strive hard
to reduce all life to a geometrical theorem and its manifestations to an
algebraic formula. But life is greater than a college professor, and so
far its mysteries, having given the slip to all the creeds, are still at
large. My individual hazard at truth is as legitimate as yours. The self
appointed beadles of letters demand that we shall neither smile nor sleep
while their Presiding Elders drone, but we plead in the World’s Assize
for the privilege of doing both.
In Art we ask for the widest, freest and fullest liberty for
Individuality—that’s all!
ELBERT HUBBARD.
CHOPIN AND GEORGE SAND.
THE LITTLE WHITE BLACK BIRD.
The game of tit for tat is rarely graceful or dignified. And yet the
man who “turns the other cheek” has not appealed strongly to the robust
sensibilities of any age. His behavior we cannot admire; it is too much
that of Sterne’s ass, who says meekly to his tormentor, “Please do not
hit me again—but if you will, you may.” Such a course surely no one of
us can be called upon to follow. Besides, the animal acted merely on
instinct, as one of a race of craven unfortunates, who while alive are
peculiarly seductive to stripes, and whose hides after death, as we all
know, are made into drums.
Perhaps the proper rule of conduct lies somewhere in between this
hypocritical or recreant meekness on the one hand, and on the other that
unchristian and vulgar manner of retaliation against which, it must have
been, that the precept of the Bible was directed.
The “lex talionis” in its literal meaning, “an eye for an eye,” and “a
tooth for a tooth,” is certainly barbarous; but surely if mine enemy has
plucked out one of my eyes, and so increased considerably the market
value of the one remaining, no dilettante in morals or the market would
deny my right to sell the other dearly, nor my privilege to write a book
upon my loss. Indeed, men’s enemies from the days of Solomon have never
asked for more than this.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account