The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
For where shall we find, amongst sensible objects, an indivisible
nature, such as that of a point, or a line without the dimension
of breadth, or a superficies without depth, or the ever constant
proportion of sides, and exact rectitude of angles? For my part, I
cannot see where, since all divisible natures are thus mixed and
confused together, nothing sincere, nothing free from its contrary,
but things every where yielding to separation, as well such as are
removed by distance of place, as those which are united together.
How then shall we obtain this durable essence for these immoveable
natures from the ever fluctuating forms of sense? For whatever derives
its existence from moveable beings, must of necessity be mutable and
frail. And how shall we gain this perfect accuracy for the stable
species, from the inaccurate and imperfect? For whatever is the cause
of a conception, always immutable, is itself much more stable than its
effect. We must therefore admit the soul to be the generator of these
mathematical species and reasons. But if she contains them in herself,
as first exemplars, she gives them an essential being, so that the
generations are nothing else than propagations of species, which had
a prior subsistence in herself: and thus we shall speak agreeably to
the sentiments of Plato, and discover the true essence of mathematical
entities. But if the soul, though she neither possesses nor received
the mathematical reasons prior to the energies of sense, yet fabricates
this admirable immaterial building, and generates this fair series of
speculations; how can she discern whether her productions are stable
and constant, or things which the winds may dissipate, and phantoms
rather than realities? What standard can she apply as the measure of
their truth? Or how, since she is destitute of their essence, can she
generate such a variety of reasons? For from such an hypothesis, we
make their subsistence fortuitous, not tending to any scientific bound.
Mathematical species are therefore the genuine offspring of the soul:
nor does she derive from sensible objects the definitions she frames,
but rather the first are propagated from the second; they are the
energies of soul, which, as it were, pregnant with forms, delivers her
immaterial progeny into the dark and fluctuating regions of matter, as
evidences of the permanent duration of her species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account