The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
the instrument of reminiscence, and to the other, hearing. But to
him who is by nature a philosopher, from whence and by what means is
reminiscence the prelude of intellectual knowledge, and an excitation
to that which truly is, and to truth itself? For this character also,
on account of its imperfection, requires a proper principle: for it is
allotted a natural virtue, an imperfect eye, and a degraded manner.
It must therefore be excited from itself; and he who is of such a
nature, rejoices in that which _is_. But to the philosopher,
says Plotinus, the mathematical disciplines must be exhibited, that
they may accustom him to an incorporeal nature, and that afterwards
using these as figures, he may be led to dialectic reasons, and to
the contemplation of all the things which _are_. And thus it is
manifest, from hence, that the mathematics are of the greatest utility
to philosophy. But it is requisite that we should be more explicit, and
mention the several particulars to which they conduce, and evince that
they prepare the intellectual apprehensions of theology. For whatever
to imperfect natures appears difficult and arduous in obtaining the
true knowledge of the gods, the mathematical reasons render, by their
images, credible, manifest, and certain. Thus, in numbers, they
indicate the significations of super-essential properties, but they
evince the powers of intellectual figures, in those figures which
fall under cogitation. Hence it is, that Plato, by mathematical forms
teaches us many and admirable sentences concerning the gods, and the
philosophy of the Pythagoreans, using these as veils, conceals from
vulgar inspection the discipline of divine sentences. For such is the
whole of the _Sacred and Divine Discourse_[79], that of Philolaus
in his Bacchics, and the universal method of the Pythagoric narration
concerning the Gods. But it especially refers to the contemplation of
nature, since it discloses the order of those reasons by which the
universe is fabricated, and that proportion which binds, as Timæus
says, whatever the world contains, in union and consent; besides, it
conciliates in amity things mutually opposing each other, and gives
convenience and consent to things mutually disagreeing, and exhibits
to our view simple and primary elements, from which the universe is
composed, on every side comprehended by commensurability and equality,
because it receives convenient figures in its proportions, and numbers
proper to every production, and finds out their revolutions and
renovations, by which we are enabled to reason concerning the best
origin, and the contrary dissolution of particulars. In consequence
of this, as it appears to me, Timæus discloses the contemplation
concerning the nature of the universe, by mathematical names, adorns
the origin of the elements with numbers and figures, referring to
these their powers, passions, and energies; and esteeming as well
the acuteness as the obtuseness of angles, the levity of sides, or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account