The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
natural science. Since ascending from inferiors, it accedes in a
certain respect proximate to intellectual knowledge, and touches the
contemplation of things primary and divine. And hence, in the limits
which flow from its essence, it produces the whole mechanic, optic,
and catoptric speculation, together with many other sciences which are
inwoven and entangled with sensible concerns, and which operate through
their assistance. Besides, in its ascensions from corporeal natures,
it derives intelligences indivisible and destitute of matter: and with
these it perfects its divisible apprehensions, those cognitions which
subsist in progressions, and its own genera and forms: it likewise
indicates the truth respecting the gods themselves, and in its peculiar
treatises exhibits a contemplation of the things which _are_. And
thus much concerning the employment and powers of the Mathematical
Science.
CHAP. VIII.
_Concerning the Utility of the Mathematical Science._
But let us now consider the utility of this Science, which extends
itself from the most principal to the last cognitions. Timæus,
therefore, calls the knowledge of the mathematical disciplines the
path of erudition, because, indeed, it has the same proportion to
universal science, and the first philosophy, which learning has to
virtue. For this last frames our soul to a perfect life, by the
possession of worthy manners; but the former prepares our cogitation,
and the divine eye of our soul to an elevation from the obscurity of
sensible information. Hence, Socrates in the Republic, says, “That
the eye of the soul, which is darkened and buried by other studies,
can by the mathematical disciplines alone be invigorated, and again
excited to the contemplation of that which _is_, and transferred
from resemblances to real beings, from an obscure light to that
light which has the power of intelligence, and from a cave, and
those bonds which exist in it as the authors of generation, and from
material impediments be able to rise to an incorporeal and indivisible
essence. For the beauty and order of mathematical reasons, and the
firmness and stability of the contemplations they afford, conjoins
us with intelligible objects, and perfectly determines us in their
essences; which perpetually remain the same, ever shining with divine
beauty, and preserving a mutual order without end. But Socrates, in
the Phædrus, delivers to us three characters who are elevated from
sense, because they fill up and accomplish the primary life of the
soul, i. e. the philosopher, the lover, and the musician. But the
beginning and path of elevation to the lover, is a progression from
apparent beauty, using as excitations the middle forms of beautiful
objects. But to the musician, who is allotted the third seat, the
way consists in a transition from sensible to invisible harmonies,
and to the reasons existing in these. So that to the one, sight is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account