The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
produced, is the form resident in cogitation: and that in which the
produced figure resides is what is called the passive intellect. Which
folds itself about the impartibility of true intellect, separates from
itself the power of pure intelligence free from interval; conforms
itself according to all formless species, and becomes perfectly
every thing from which cogitation itself, and our indivisible reason
consists. And thus much concerning the geometric matter, as we are
not ignorant of whatever Porphyry the Philosopher has observed in his
miscellanies, and whatever many of the Platonists describe. But we
think that the present discussions are more agreeable to geometric
dissertations, and to Plato himself, who subjects to geometry the
objects of cogitation. For these mutually agree among themselves;
because the causes, indeed, of geometrical forms, by which cogitation
produces demonstrations, pre-exist in demonstration itself: but the
particular figures which are divided and compounded, are situated in
the receptacle of the phantasy.
CHAP. II.
_What kind of Science Geometry is._
But let us now speak of that science which possesses a power of
contemplating the universal forms participated by imaginative matter.
Geometry, therefore, is endued with the knowledge of magnitudes and
figures, and of the terms and reasons subsisting in these; together
with the passions, various positions and motions which are contingent
about these. For it proceeds, indeed, from an impartible point, but
descends even to solids, and finds out their multiform diversities.
And again, runs back from things more composite, to things more
simple, and to the principles of these: since it uses compositions
and resolutions, always beginning from suppositions, and assuming its
principles from a previous science; but employing all the dialectic
ways. In principles, by the divisions of forms from their genera, and
by defining its orations. But in things posterior to principles, by
demonstrations and resolutions. As likewise, it exhibits things more
various, proceeding from such as are more simple, and returning to
them again. Besides this, it separately discourses of its subjects;
separately of its axioms; from which it rises to demonstrations;
and separately of essential accidents, which it shews likewise are
resident in its subjects. For every science has, indeed, a genus, about
which it is conversant, and whose passions it proposes to consider:
and besides this, principles, which it uses in demonstrations; and
essential accidents. Axioms, indeed, are common to all sciences
(though each employs them in its peculiar subject matter), but genus
and essential accident vary according to the sciential variety. The
subjects of geometry are therefore, indeed, triangles, quadrangles,
circles, and universally figures and magnitudes, and the boundaries of
these. But its essential accidents are divisions, ratios, contacts,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account