The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
But what gave rise to the name of elementary institution, and of
element itself, from which elementary institution was derived?
To this we shall reply, by observing, that of theorems some are
usually called elements, but others elementary, and others again are
determined beyond the power of these. Hence, an element is that whose
consideration passes to the science of other things, and from which we
derive a solution of the doubts incident to the particular science we
investigate. For as there are certain first principles of speech, most
simple and indivisible, which we denominate elements, and from which
all discourse is composed; so there are certain principal theorems of
the whole of geometry, denominated elements, which have the respect of
principles to the following theorems; which regard all the subsequent
propositions, and afford the demonstrations of many accidents essential
to the subjects of geometric speculation. But things elementary
are such as extend themselves to a multitude of propositions, and
possess a certain simplicity and sweetness, yet are not of the same
dignity with elements; because their contemplation is not common to
all the science to which they belong, as is the case in the following
theorem, that in triangles, perpendiculars, drawn from their angles
to their sides, coincide in one point[118]. Lastly, whatever neither
possesses a knowledge extended into multitude, nor exhibits any thing
skilful and elegant, falls beyond the elementary power. Again, an
element, as Menæchmus says, may have a twofold definition. For that
which confirms, is an element of that which is confirmed; as the first
proposition of Euclid with respect to the second, and the fourth with
regard to the fifth. And thus, indeed, many things may be mutually
called elements one of another; for they are mutually confirmed.
Thus, because the external angles of right-lined figures, are equal
to four right angles, the multitude of internal ones equal to right
angles; and, on the contrary, that from this is exhibited[119].
Besides, an element is otherwise called that into which, because it
is more simple, a composite is dissolved. But it must be observed,
that every element cannot be called the element of every thing: but
such as are more principal are the elements of such as are constituted
in the reason of the thing effected; as petitions are the elements
of theorems. And, according to this signification of an element,
Euclid’s elements are constructed. Some, indeed, of that geometry
which is conversant about planes; but others of stereometry. In the
same manner, likewise, in arithmetic and astronomy, many have composed
elementary institutions. But it is difficult, in each science, to chuse
and conveniently ordain elements, from which all the peculiarities of
that science originate, and into which they may be resolved. And among
those who have undertaken this employment, some have been able to
collect more, but others fewer elements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account