The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
And some, indeed, have used
shorter demonstrations; but others have extended their treatise to an
infinite length. And some have omitted the method by an impossibility;
but others that by proportion; and others, again, have attempted
preparations against arguments destroying principles. So that many
methods of elementary institution have been invented by particular
writers on this subject. But it is requisite that this treatise should
entirely remove every thing superfluous, because it is an impediment to
science. But every thing should be chosen, which contains and concludes
the thing proposed; for this is most convenient and useful in science.
The greatest care, likewise, should be paid to clearness and brevity;
for the contraries to these, disturb our cogitation. Lastly, it should
vindicate to itself, the universal comprehension of theorems, in their
proper bounds: for such things as divide learning into particular
fragments, produce an incomprehensible knowledge. But in all these
modes, any one may easily find, that the elementary institution of
Euclid excels the institutions of others. For its utility, indeed,
especially confers to the contemplation of primary figures: but the
transition from things more simple to such as are more various, and
also that perception, which from axioms possesses the beginning of
knowledge, produces clearness, and an orderly tradition: and the
migration from first and principal theorems to the objects of enquiry,
effects the universality of demonstration. For whatever he seems to
omit, may either be known by the same ways, as the construction of a
scalene and isosceles triangle[120]: or because they are difficult,
and capable of infinite variety, they are far remote from the election
of elements, such as the doctrine of perturbate proportions, which
Apollonius has copiously handled: or, lastly, because they may be
easily constructed from the things delivered, as from causes, such as
many species of angles and lines. For these, indeed, were omitted by
Euclid, and are largely discoursed of by others, and are known from
simple propositions. And thus much concerning the universal elementary
institution of geometry.
CHAP. VIII.
_Concerning the Order of Geometrical Discourses._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account