The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
After a point and a line, a superficies is placed, which is distant
by a twofold interval, length and breadth. But this also remaining
destitute of thickness or bulk, possesses a nature more simple than
body, which is distant by a triple dimension. On which account the
geometrician adds to the two intervals the particle _only_,
because the third interval does not exist in superficies. And this is
equivalent to a negation of bulk, as here also he shews the excellency
of superficies compared to a solid with respect to simplicity, by
negation, or by an addition equivalent to negation: but the diminution
which it possesses, if compared with the preceding terms, by the
affirmations themselves. But others define a superficies to be the
boundary of body, which is almost affirming the same as the definition
of Euclid; since that which terminates is exceeded in one dimension,
by that which is terminated. And others, a magnitude different by
two intervals. Lastly, others declaring the same affection, form its
assignation in a somewhat different manner. But they say we have a
knowledge of superficies when we measure fields, and distinguish their
extremities according to length and breadth; but that we receive a
certain sensation of it, when we behold shadows. For as they are
without bulk, because they cannot penetrate into the interior part of
the earth, they have only length and breadth. But the Pythagoreans
say, that it is assimilated to the triad; because the ternary is by
far the first cause to all the figures; which a superficies contains.
For a circle, which is the principle of orbicular figures, occultly
possesses the ternary, by its centre, interval, and circumference. But
a triangle, which ranks as the first among all right-lined figures, on
every side evinces that it is enclosed by the triad, and receives its
form from its perfect nature.
DEFINITION VI.
The Extremities of a SUPERFICIES are Lines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account