The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
After the monadic figure having the relation of a principle to all
figures, and the biformed semi-circle, the progression of right-lined
figures in infinitum, according to numbers, is delivered. For on this
account also, mention was made of the semi-circle, as communicating
according to terms or boundaries; partly, indeed, with the circle,
but partly with right-lines: just as the duad is the medium between
unity and number. For unity, by composition, produces more than by
multiplication; but number, on the contrary, is more increased by
multiplication than composition: and the duad, whether multiplied into,
or compounded with itself, produces an equal quantity. As, therefore,
the duad is the middle of unity and number, so likewise, a semi-circle
communicates, according to its base, with right-lines; but according
to its circumference, with the circle. But right-lined figures proceed
orderly to infinity, attended by number and its bounding power,
which begins from the triad. On this account, Euclid also begins
from hence[175]. For he says, trilateral and quadrilateral, and the
following figures, called by the common name of multilateral: since
trilateral figures are also multilaterals; but they have likewise
a proper, besides a common denomination. But, as we are but little
able to pursue the rest, on account of the infinite progression of
numbers, we must be content with a common denomination. But he only
makes mention of trilaterals and quadrilaterals, because the triad and
tetrad are the first in the order of numbers; the former being a pure
odd among the odd; but the latter, an entire even among even numbers.
Euclid, therefore, assumes both in the origin of right-lined figures,
for the purpose of exhibiting their subsistence, according to all even
and odd numbers. Besides, since he is about to teach concerning these
in the first book, as especially elementary (I mean triangles and
parallelograms) he does not undeservedly, as far as to these, establish
a proper enumeration: but he embraces all other right-lined figures by
a common name, calling them multilaterals: but of these enough. Again,
assuming a more elevated exordium, we must say, that of plane figures,
some are contained by simple lines, others by such as are mixt, but
others again by both. And of those which are comprehended by simple
lines, some are contained by similars in species, as right-lines; but
others by dissimilars in species, as semi-circles, and segments, and
apsides, which are less than semi-circles. Likewise of those which
are contained by similars in species, some are comprehended by a
circular line; but others by a right-line. And of those comprehended
by a circular line, some are contained by one, others by two, but
others by more than two. By one, indeed, the circle itself. But by
two, some without angles, as the crowns[176] terminated by concentric
circles; but others angular (γεγωνιωμένα) as the lunula. And of those
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account