It is easy to discover that many things must have occurred in the
street which did not affect our full consciousness. We may learn
afterwards that we have passed several friends without recognising
them; we may read in the newspapers about things that happened that
we might have seen, but which we did not see; we may think we know
the street fairly well, but we find that we have difficulty in
recalling the names of three contiguous shops in it; if we happen to
see a photograph which was taken at the time we passed through the
street we are usually surprised to find that there were many things
there that we did not see. Why is it, then, that so much that might
have been perceived by us was not really perceived? We cannot doubt
that everything that came into the visual fields of our eyes must
have affected the terminations of the optic nerves in the retinas;
the complex disturbances of the air in the street must have set our
tympanic membranes in motion; and all the odoriferous particles inhaled
into our nostrils must have stimulated the olfactory mucous membranes.
In all these cases the stimulation of the receptor organs must have
initiated nervous impulses, and these must have been propagated along
the sensory nerves, and must have reached the brain, affecting masses
of nerve cells there. Nothing in physiology seems to indicate that we
can inhibit or repress the activity of the distance sense-receptors,
visual, auditory, and olfactory, with their central connections in
the brain; they must have functioned, and must have been physically
affected by the events that took place outside ourselves, and yet
we were unconscious, in the fullest sense of this term, of all this
activity. Why is it, then, that our perception was so much less
than the actual physical reception of external stimuli that we must
postulate as having occurred? Sherlock Holmes would have said that we
really saw and heard all these things although we did not observe them,
but the full explanation involves a much more careful consideration of
the phenomena of perception than this saying indicates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account