It is well known that de Vries himself considered fluctuating
variations and mutations as something quite different. The former he
considered as nothing new, only as augmentations or diminutions of
something previously existing; and he regarded fluctuations as due to
the action of the environment, following in their distribution the laws
of chance.[30] Mutations, on the other hand, were something quite new.
Now future analysis of variability will not, we think, bear out the
validity of this distinction. It is far more likely that a fluctuation
is a variation which is the result of some causes the action of
which is variable. (We are regarding variability now as subject to
“causation” in the physical sense, for only by so regarding it can we
attempt its analysis). As a rule this process results in a fluctuation,
but if its extent, or degree of operation, exceeds a certain “critical
value” a mutation is produced. We may, following the example of the
physicists, illustrate this by a “model.”
[30] See Appendix, p. 351.
[Illustration: FIG. 23.]
This model is a modification of Galton’s illustration of the degrees of
stability of a species. It is a disc of wood rolling on its periphery.
We divide it into sectors, and the arcs _ab_, _cd_, _ef_, and _gh_ have
all the same radius, 10, 20, 30, and 40. Then we flatten the sectors
_bc_, _de_, _fg_, and _ha_, so that their radii are greater than are
those of the other arcs. Now let us cause the disc to roll about the
point 8 as a centre. It will oscillate backwards and forwards about a
mean position 8. Let us think of these oscillations as fluctuations.
Suppose, however, that we cause the disc to roll a little more
violently, so that it oscillates until either of the points 3 or
4 are perpendicularly beneath the centre _O_. In either of these
positions the disc is in a condition of “unstable equilibrium,” and an
infinitesimal increase in the extent of an oscillation will cause it
to roll beyond the points 3 or 4. But if it does pass either of these
critical points it will begin to oscillate about either of the new
centres 5 or 7, thus rolling on one of the arcs, _ha_ or _de_. This
assumption of a new condition of stability we may compare with the
formation of a mutation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account