Thus our ignorance of the precise nature
of the energy-transformations of inorganic things--an ignorance which
is all the while disappearing--becomes the excuse for a comparison of
these with vital transformations, and for the assumption that there is
a fundamental similarity in the two kinds of happening.
Less is assumed in the assumption of an entelechian agency than in
assuming that the manifestations of life are the consequences of a
vital “energy-form,” different from inorganic forms, though belonging
to the same order, inasmuch as it may be concatenated with these
inorganic energy-forms. We need not suppose that a particular kind of
transformation occurs only in the sphere of the organic: all that we
need assume is that, by some agency inherent in the activities of the
organism, chemical reactions that would occur if the constellation
of parts were an inorganic one are suspended. Nothing unfamiliar to
physical science is involved in this assumption. Hydrogen and chlorine,
gases that combine together when mixed with the production of heat and
light, may be mixed under conditions such that the combination may be
delayed for an indefinite time. Iron which dissolves in nitric acid
may nevertheless be brought into the “passive” form when it remains in
contact with the re-agent but is not dissolved by it. Enzymes which
are in contact with the walls of the alimentary canal do not dissolve
these membranes so long as the tissues are alive, and they do not
dissolve the food stuff until they have been “activated.” Oxygen which
is contained in the tissues does not oxidise the tissue substances
until an enzyme or a catalase has exerted its influence. More and more,
as physiology has become more searching in its study of the functions
of the animal, has it sought to explain the metabolic processes
by assuming the intervention of enzymes, until the number of these
substances has become legion, and much of the original simplicity of
the notion of ferment-activity has been lost. But why do not these
enzymes, if they are always present in the tissues, always act? They
must be activated, says modern physiology; that is, the enzyme really
exists in the tissues as a “zymogen” or a substance which is not, but
which may become, an enzyme; or they exist as “zymoids,” that is,
substances which appear to be chemically enzymes, but which must be
activated by “kinases” before they can become functional.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account