If the body were in motion, we should find that muscular exertion is
necessary in order that it might be brought to rest; and if it were at
rest, we should find that muscular exertion was necessary in order that
it might be moved. The body, matter in general, possesses inertia, and
this is its most fundamental attribute. Mass we can only conceive in
terms of inertia. If two bodies were at rest, and if the same degree
of muscular exertion conferred on each the same initial velocity of
motion, their masses would be equal. If the same degree of muscular
exertion conferred different velocities on different bodies, their
masses would be different, and would vary directly with the initial
velocities conferred.
FORCE
The feeling which we experience when we move a body from a state of
rest, or stop a body which is moving, is what we call force. If on
climbing a stair in the dark we think there is one step more than there
is, and so have the queer, familiar, feeling of treading on nothing,
we have the intuition of energy; but when we tread on the steps, and
so raise our body, we have the intuition of force. Force is that which
accelerates the velocity of a mass. If the latter is at rest, we
consider it to have zero velocity. If it is moving, and we stop it,
there is still acceleration, but this is negative.
Matter, that is, the _substantia physica_, is clearly to be conceived
only in terms of energy. It is, to our direct intuitions, resistance,
or inertia, that which requires energy in order that it may be made to
undergo change. Our static idea of physical solidity, or massiveness,
disappears on ultimate analysis. Molecules are made up of atoms, and
the atoms are assumed to have all the characters of matter: we could
not _see_ them, of course, even if we possessed all the magnifying
power that we wished, for they would be too small to reflect light.
Modern physical theory is compelled to regard atoms as complex, and
imagines them as being composed of moving electrons. The electron
is immaterial--it is the unit-charge of electricity. It is said to
possess mass, but mass is now understood to mean inertia. So long as
the electron is moving, it sets up a field of energy round it, and this
field--the electro-magnetic one--extends in all directions. Periodic
disturbances in it constitute radiation, and this radiation travels
with the velocity of light. It is because of the existence of this
field that we are _obliged_ to postulate the existence of an ether
of space. Unfamiliar to us until the discovery of Hertzian waves and
“wireless” telegraphy, this electro-magnetic radiation in space is now
accessible to our direct intuitions. We can initiate it by setting
electrons in motion, that is, by expending energy (producing the
sparking in the transmitters of the wireless telegraphy apparatus); and
we can stop it, if it is in existence, by absorbing the energy (in the
receivers of the wireless telegraphy apparatus). This is essentially
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account