The metaphysics of science has taken another turn. It is true
that men and women see something outside themselves which differs
slightly in different individuals--these differences are due to what
we call the “personal equation.” The image of the universe seen by
some individuals may differ profoundly from the image seen by some
others, or most others; but a well-marked gap separates these slight
individual deviations in the images seen by normal individuals from
the large deviations seen by those whose perceptions are what we call
pathological ones. The normal universe common to the majority of
men and women is an aggregate of molecules in motion. But this is a
conclusion with which modern physics has been unable to remain content,
for molecules must be able to act on each other across empty space, and
this is inconceivable. The universe therefore consists of a homogeneous
immaterial medium, the ether of space, and this is the true _substantia
physica_. Molecules and radiation are conditions of the ether, and for
the physicist it is the only reality. The “materialism” of our own
time is therefore the belief in the existence, unconditioned by time
or anything else, of the ether, or physical continuum; a homogeneous
medium, of which matter and energy, and the consciousness of the
organism, are only states or conditions.
The materialism of the twentieth century, like the idealism of
Berkeley, thus finds that there is something outside our own
consciousness that possesses absolute existence. To the materialist it
is the ether of space, and to Berkeley it is the existence of absolute
Mind. But if our desire to avoid metaphysics is a genuine one, we
must reject the notion of the universal ether no less than we must
reject the notion of an absolute Mind, and we must rest content with
pure phenomenalism. For each of us there can be no existence except
that which is perceived or conceptualised. There is nothing but our
own consciousness; there cannot even be an Ego which perceives; there
is only perception. We never do really believe this in spite of our
professions of reason. We find on strict self-analysis that we believe
that there is an Ego that perceives and that there are other Egos
that perceive, and that the universe which our Ego perceives is also
the same universe that other Egos perceive. If we did not believe that
there were other men and women that perceived--other consciousnesses
like our own, all that part of our own behaviour that we call morality
would be meaningless. In a philosophy of pure idealism other men and
women are only phenomena; only bodies moving in nature. Why, then,
should these elements of our consciousness influence the rest of our
consciousness as if they were men and women like ourselves. All this
amounts to saying that while our speculative thought suggests to us
that all that exists is our stream of consciousness, our actions must
convince us that there are other thinking individuals like ourselves.[5]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account