Heat is evolved which raises steam in the boiler, and the
steam actuates an engine, and the latter exhibits measurable kinetic
energy. Where did this come from? It was potential in the coal, we
say, though no method known to physics enables us to prove this by
mere inspection of the coal. We must cause the latter to undergo some
transformation. But by rigid methods we can estimate very exactly the
potential energy of the coal, and we can calculate the kinetic energy
equivalent to this. Yet again we find that the kinetic energy of the
steam-engine is only a fraction of that which calculation shows us
is the equivalent of the kinetic energy of the coal. What becomes
of the balance? We can be quite certain that it has been dissipated
in friction, radiation, loss of heat by conduction, loss of heat in
the condenser, and so on, although we cannot prove this rigidly by
experimental methods.
Think of the universe as an isolated system. It contains an invariable
quantity of energy. This energy may be that of bodies in motion--suns,
planets, cosmic dust, molecules, etc.--when it is kinetic energy;
or it may be the energy of electric charges at rest or in motion;
or any one of the many kinds of potential energy. It may pass
through numerous transformations--the chemical potential energy of
coal may be transformed into the kinetic energy of water molecules
(steam at high temperature), and this into the kinetic energy of the
revolving armature of a dynamo, and this again into the energy of
moving electrons (the current of electricity in the circuit of the
dynamo), and then again into the energy of ethereal vibration (light,
heat, X-rays, or other electro-magnetic waves), and these again into
mechanical or kinetic energy, and so on. When we say that we can
control energy we say that we can produce these transformations; we can
cause things to happen, we bring becoming into being. In this sense
energy is causality. But while the sum-total of energy in the universe
remains constant, the sum of causality continually diminishes. Energy
is the power, or condition, of producing _diversity_, but while energy
can suffer no diminution of quantity, diversity tends continually to
decrease.
In the last two sentences we state, in one way, the second law of
thermodynamics--in some respects the most fundamental result of our
experience in the physical investigation of the universe. In its most
technical form, as enunciated by Clausius, this law states that the
value of a certain mathematical function, called _entropy_,[8] tends
continually towards a maximum, when it is applied to the universe as a
whole. When we say the “universe,” we mean all that comes within our
power of physical investigation. Let us now see what this statement
means.
[8] See appendix, p. 369. Entropy is a shadowy kind of concept,
difficult to grasp. But again we may point out that the reader who
would extend the notion of mechanism into life simply _must_ grasp it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account