The Philosophy of Earthquakes, Natural and Religious: or, An Inquiry Into Their Cause, and Their PurposeStukeley, William
Religion
The Philosophy of Earthquakes, Natural and Religious: or, An Inquiry Into Their Cause, and Their Purpose
Stukeley, William
Earthquakes
To answer this, consult the ingineers, and those that make mines in the
sieges of towns; they will acquaint us, that the effect of mines is
produced in form of an inverted cone. And that a diameter of 30 miles, in
the base, will require an _axis_ of 15 or 20 miles to operate upon that
base, so as to shake it, at least. Now the vapours, or whatever power we
propose to operate, according to the foregoing requisite, in order to form
the appearance of an earthquake, must be 15 or 20 miles deep in the earth.
But what mind can conceive, that any natural power is able to move an
inverted cone of solid earth, whose base is 30 miles diameter, whose axis
20? or was it possible; would not the whole texture of that body of earth
be quite disturb'd and shatter'd, especially in regard to its springs and
fountains? but nothing like this is ever found to be the consequence of an
earthquake, tho' fatal to cities.
Apply this reasoning to the earthquake of _Asia minor_, and this vigorous
principle at the _apex_ of the cone must lie, at least, 200 Miles deep in
the ground. Enough to show the absurdity of any moving power plac'd under
the Earth! A cone of 300 miles diameter at base, 200 miles _axis_: I dare
be bold to say, that all the gun-powder made since its invention, if put
together and fired, would not be able to move it; how much less pent up
vapours? what must we say of a circle of 900 miles diameter?
But, could that be admitted as possible, would any one be persuaded,
that such a subterraneous tumult, of so vast an extent, will be no ways
injurious to the internal system of springs and fountains, and that this
shall often be repeated without the least damage? We may as well imagine,
that we can stab a man 100 times and never touch vein or artery.
Since I gave in my two papers to the Royal Society, a letter of Mr.
_Flamsted_'s has been printed, which abundantly confirms my sentiments.
The whole drift of it is, to show how invalid is the vulgar idea
conceiv'd, of earthquakes arising from subterraneous vapours and
eruptions: That the earth itself is not moved to any depth, and that the
shock must arise from the atmosphere. The circumstances which he has
judiciously collected, are extremely agreeable to mine; many of them the
very same, strongly confirming my _hypothesis_: And had that great man
known the properties of electricity, which we are now masters of, he would
have prevented me in this affair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account