The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 2 (of 4): Hegel's AesthetikHegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy
The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 2 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Aesthetics
[Footnote 20: _Sichhervorarbeiten._ Our word "elaborate" is here
insufficient. Hegel means the mode in which the Idea of art works
itself free from entirely potential obscurity into a living force,
a real _energeia._ We cannot say "emerges into daylight," however,
because the highest grasp of symbolic art is still only a twilight. It
is like the growth of the plant-germ, still underground, or partially
so.]
[Footnote 21: _Pracktischen._ Not matter-of-fact relation, but rather a
relation that asserts itself exclusively in action.]
[Footnote 22: _Als Grund_, that is, as a fundamental unity of the real.]
[Footnote 23: _Die erste näher gestaltende Dollmetcherin_, lit., the
first interpreter which supplies forms more nearly cognate with itself.]
[Footnote 24: It is valid (_geltend_) because it introduces there its
own spiritual nature.]
[Footnote 25: The previous statement of Hegel must not be overlooked,
however, and it may be considerably amplified, that there is much in
romantic art which is related to symbolism and the sublime. Take the
case of the celebrated sculpture of Michael Angelo typifying Night,
Day, Dawn, and Twilight, or such modern pictures as those of Watts's
"The Minotaur" and "The Spirit of Christianity."]
[Footnote 26: Or rather "between those aspects of its import and form
which are reciprocally homogeneous and those which are not."]
[Footnote 27: This process of symbolic art.]
[Footnote 28: _Hauptstufen._ The word signifies either the phase or
grade of a process of development, or to take the metaphor used by
Hegel above (_Stadien_) may perhaps be better translated by "stage," as
though indicating the successive stages of a journey.]
[Footnote 29: I think _Völkern_ rather than _Zeiten_ must be here
understood, and the sense appears to be that the confusion indicated
refers to a mingling of forms appropriate to a nation in one historical
period with those that are more cognate with a people at any earlier
or it may be later period. But unquestionably this attempt to identify
a type as between different nations with historical periods that will
harmonize with Hegel's own classification is a difficult matter as we
may see by the fact that Egypt, the oldest example of all, represents
the third stage. On the other hand, if the confusion referred to is
applied to the particular development of any one people, the examples
given by Hegel do not bear on the difficulty they illustrate.]
[Footnote 30: Or rather "the import of the Absolute."]
[Footnote 31: _Substantiality_, called below _die Substanz_; the word
signifies the real essence of the Absolute.]
[Footnote 32: The principal clause of this sentence has no end as
printed. The auxiliary must be omitted either before _in diesem
Dienste_ or _eine positive._ I prefer the first alternative.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account