The Philosophy of Health; Volume 1 (of 2): or, an exposition of the physical and mental constitution of manSmith, Southwood
Philosophy
The Philosophy of Health; Volume 1 (of 2): or, an exposition of the physical and mental constitution of man
Smith, Southwood
Hygiene; Physiology
4. As we ascend in the scale of organization, numerous functions being
carried on, and numerous organs constructed for performing them, it
is obvious that the range of each function must be proportionally
extended; the range necessarily increasing with the multiplication
of organ and function: and this is another cause of the unavoidable
complication of structure. Slight consideration will suffice to show
the necessary connexion between an extended range of action and
complication of structure. Take, as an example, the organic function
of respiration: respiration is the function by which air is brought
into contact with food; it is the completion of digestion. The sole
end of all the apparatus that belongs to this function is to bring the
air and the food into a certain degree of proximity. Now, when all the
substances that enter into the composition of the body of an animal are
slight, delicate, and permeable to air (as in fig. XIV.), and when the
body is always surrounded by air, air must at all times be in contact
with the particular organ that contains the food, no less than with
the general system to which the food is distributed. In this case, to
construct a separate apparatus for containing air would be useless,
because wherever food is, there air must be, since it constantly
permeates every part of the body.
[Illustration: Fig. XIV.]
When, on the other hand, the tissues are so firm and dense as to be
impermeable; when they are folded into bulky and complex organs, and
when these organs are placed in situations to which the external air
cannot reach, the construction of a separate apparatus for respiration
is indispensable. The respiratory apparatus consists either of organs
for carrying air to the food, or of organs for carrying food to the
air. The one or the other is adopted, according to the nature of the
body. If the size of the animal be small; if the tissues which form
the solid portion of its body be delicate in texture; if, at the same
time, the wants of its economy require that its food should be highly
aërated (for there is the closest connexion between energy of function
and perfect aëration of the food), an apparatus of sufficient magnitude
to aërate the food in a high degree would occupy the entire bulk of the
body. In such a case, it is easier to carry air to the food than food
to the air; it is better to make the entire body a respiratory organ,
than to construct a respiratory organ disproportioned to the magnitude
of the body. Air-tubes diffused through every part of the body, and
opening on its external surface, would obviously afford to every point
of the system an easy access of air. By an expedient of this kind the
system might be highly aërated, while the respiratory apparatus would
occupy but a comparatively small space; the function might be performed
on an extended scale, while there would be no necessity for encumbering
a minute body with a bulky organ. And this is the mode in which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account