The Philosophy of Health; Volume 1 (of 2): or, an exposition of the physical and mental constitution of manSmith, Southwood
Philosophy
The Philosophy of Health; Volume 1 (of 2): or, an exposition of the physical and mental constitution of man
Smith, Southwood
Hygiene; Physiology
injured, and the slightest injury perilling life, a free and secure
place to act in. The fragile part of the apparatus is defended by the
osseous portion of it, the play of the latter being equally essential
to the function as that of the former. In like manner the tender and
delicate substance of the brain and spinal cord, the central seat of
the animal life, with which all the senses are in intimate communion,
is protected by bones and muscles which perform important voluntary
movements while the organs of sense which put us in connexion with the
external world, which render us susceptible of pleasure, and which
give us notice of the approach of objects capable of exciting pain,
are placed where external bodies may be brought most conveniently
and completely into contact with them; and where alone they can be
efficient as the sentinels of the system. For this reason, with the
exception of the sense of touch, which, though placed especially at the
extremities of the fingers, is also diffused over the whole external
surface of the frame, all the senses have their several seats in the
head, the most elevated part of the body, of an ovoid figure, capable
of moving independently of the rest of the fabric, and which, being
supported on a pivot, is enabled to describe at least two-thirds of a
circle.
Such is the difference in the structure and position of the apparatus
of the two lives, but the difference in their action is still more
striking.
1. The action of the apparatus of the organic life when sound is
without consciousness; the object of the action of the apparatus of
the animal life is the production of consciousness. The final cause
of the action of the apparatus of the organic life is the maintenance
of existence; the final cause of the action of the apparatus of the
animal life is the production of conscious existence. What purpose
would be answered by connecting consciousness with the action of
the organic organs? Were we sensible of the organic processes; did
we know when the heart beats, and the lung plays, and the stomach
digests, and the excretory organ excretes, the consciousness could
not promote, but might disturb the due and orderly course of these
processes. Moreover they would so occupy and engross our minds that
we should have little inclination or time to attend to other objects.
Beneficently therefore are they placed equally beyond our observation
and control. Nevertheless, when our consciousness of these processes
may be of service; when they are going wrong; when their too feeble or
too intense action is in danger of destroying existence, the animal
life is made sensible of what is passing in the organic, in order that
the former may take beneficial cognizance of the latter, may do what
experience may have taught to be conducive to the restoration of the
diseased organ to a sound state, or avoid doing what may conduce to the
increase or maintenance of its morbid condition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account