The Philosophy of History, Vol. 2 of 2 — John Shaqi
The Philosophy of History, Vol. 2 of 2Schlegel, Friedrich von
Philosophy
The Philosophy of History, Vol. 2 of 2
Schlegel, Friedrich von
History; History -- Philosophy
prevented from obtaining a firm footing in the North-eastern
provinces, by the Black Sea. The Emperor Decius perished in the war
against this people; and the Romans were obliged to surrender to them
by a formal treaty, the further Dacia. Constantine, indeed, was
victorious in the war he waged against them; but he preferred to
conclude an advantageous peace, to gain their friendship, and enlist
their youth in the service of the Roman armies. Of the later reigns
that of Diocletian displayed the greatest energy; but his cruel
persecution of the Christians was, even to judge from the mere
external state of society, as little adapted to the spirit of the age
as it was reprehensible in itself, and hence his design remained
unaccomplished. Although, after his abdication, Diocletian showed
himself a thorough Roman in private life, yet, while he swayed the
sceptre, he deemed it expedient to surround the throne with all the
pomp and forms of Asiatic homage. The division of the empire among
several sovereigns appeared then, as afterwards, under Constantine and
his successors, an unavoidable and necessary evil; or, in other words,
the several parts and members of the vast body of the Roman Empire,
which approached nearer and nearer to its dissolution, began to fall
to pieces, and that division itself accelerated again the destruction
of the state, as it became the occasion of internal discord, and
universal convulsion in the Roman world. The revolution accomplished
by Constantine, indeed, might have become a real, and by far the most
comprehensive, regeneration of the Roman state, as it substituted for
its originally defective, and now completely rotten, foundation of
Paganism, a new principle of life, a higher and more potent energy of
divine truth and eternal justice. But Christianity had not yet near
become the universal religion of the people, and Empire of
Rome--otherwise the great re-action, which took place under Julian,
had not been possible. The peasantry, in particular, continued for a
long time yet attached to the old idolatry; and hence the name of
Pagans was derived.[3] Even Constantine, though he publicly declared
himself a convert to Christianity, still did not dare to receive
baptism immediately, and thus enter fully into the great community of
Christians. The administration of the Roman state was so completely
interwoven with Pagan rites and Pagan doctrines, that, from an act of
this public nature, dangerous collisions might have at first easily
ensued. On the whole, the old Roman maxims and principles of
state-policy continued to prevail, even for a long time after the
reign of Constantine; and the period had not yet arrived when
Christianity was to work a fundamental reform throughout the whole
political world,--and a Christian government, if I may so speak, was
to be established and organized on that eternal basis, and to strike
deep root and grow into the faith and life of the people, and into
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account