The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) : $b selected from the columns of the Reading Times, Reading, Pennsylvania : with a biographical appreciation by his friend Henry W. ShoemakerHuff, Jacob K.
Philosophy
The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) : $b selected from the columns of the Reading Times, Reading, Pennsylvania : with a biographical appreciation by his friend Henry W. Shoemaker
Huff, Jacob K.
American essays; Huff, Jacob K., 1851-1910
I do not know; justice must surely mean the same rewards for the ox as it
means for man, for how can simple justice discriminate between animals,
and still remain simple justice? And the man who is willing to grasp
an immortality that discriminates between him and the ox, is neither
merciful, charitable, nor just. Immortality must surely embrace all the
living creatures, or part of life would be left behind, and immortality
would be incomplete and imperfect. God must be the God of all. If the ox
is an inferior creature, the fault lies with the creator and not with the
created thing. If there is no justice and mercy for the ox, then justice
and mercy have limits, and God is not so powerful to save his creatures
as he is to create them.
I do not know; my faith in immortality may be the child of my hopes and
longings. If I am always to be I always was in existence somewhere. I am
positively certain that I know of no evidence to prove a past existence,
for hope does not lead backward. Hope points always ahead, from where
the winds of the future are always blowing. I know that I desire to live
always, to think always, to hope always, to love on and on forever and
ever.
TEACH SENTIMENT
Sentiment is a creature of education. A child will naturally imitate its
parents. If they are unfeeling and cruel, the child will be the same,
at least until it falls under a different influence. Sentiment is not
inherited. The average child is cruel and heartless until old enough to
imitate the sentimental spirit of old people. Therefore, it should be
the first lesson impressed upon the child mind that cruelty and wanton
heartlessness is brutal, and does not belong to civilized man.
In my own case I have always been opposed to keeping pet animals or birds
confined in a cage—no, not always: When a boy I was always catching birds
and squirrels and rabbits to start a menagerie. I remember one time of
keeping a red squirrel in a cage for two years. I hadn’t then learned
that kindness to the weakest of God’s creatures shows a largeness of the
human heart. I was then a lad of fifteen years.
But one day while watching the red squirrel leaping from one side of
the cage to the bottom, then bounding to the other side and back again,
and on to the opposite side and back again, over and over again, all
through the day, and day after day, for the exercise it needed to keep
its health—one day while watching the poor imprisoned animal at its
daily exercise, the thought came to me that the little animal would be
so much happier outside the cage. Then it dawned on me that I was simply
keeping the poor thing imprisoned to gratify my own selfish pleasure.
Simply to look at and enjoy its efforts to make life tolerable under such
distressing conditions. I had actually been enjoying the restless efforts
of the squirrel to make prison life healthful; for had the animal sat
down to mourn and pout and sorrow for the freedom it once enjoyed, it
would have died in a few weeks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account