The Philosophy of Natural Theology: An Essay in confutation of the scepticism of the present dayJackson, William
Religion
The Philosophy of Natural Theology: An Essay in confutation of the scepticism of the present day
Jackson, William
Natural theology; Religion -- Philosophy; Religion and science
_Analysis_--Man the interpreter of Nature. Nature _gives_ by answering
our interrogations; these must depend on our powers of assimilating
knowledge. Some questions inevitable, _e.g._, What are the first
grounds of Truth?
Has Man any faculty of apprehending the Infinite? Can we know our own
Personality or that of others?--or any Thing in itself? Inference
against Scepticism based on human ignorance.
Fallacy of the Unthinkable or Inconceivable. Ideas of Self and
not-Self, inexplicable, yet undoubted. From things as they are, let us
turn to things as they appear. How do we perceive, hear, see?
Perception as an instrument of Intelligence, inscrutable. We
acknowledge the insoluble mystery but accept the fact.
Marvels of eyesight, and their problems. How much and what do we see?
Comparison with Sound;--Form, Colour, Tone. Evidence on which we
receive sense impressions. Comparison between healthy and diseased
sensations,--between our organs of sense and those of animals. We soon
arrive at a twilight territory of knowledge and can explain no more.
Imperfections in our powers of Verification. How great is the
subjective Element in our perceptions? Idealism,--most difficult
to answer when most extreme. Philosophic denial of all proof of
external things as distinguished from Mind (_e.g._, by Mill).
Fact-knowledge, and absurdities involved in the ordinary method
of defining and alleging Facts. Polar tendencies of Phenomenalism
which take the shapes of Idealism and Positivism, resulting in
Nihilism or Indifferentism. The end of these things! Mr. Herbert
Spencer on Theology, compared with Mr. Huxley, and criticized by Mr.
J. Martineau, who denies that the Unknowable can be any object of
religious feeling,--a protest strongly maintained by Mr. J. S. Mill.
The difficulties attending every kind of knowledge paralleled with
the difficulties alleged against Theism. If the Inexplicable be also
the Unknowable, there is an end to all knowledge. We cannot predicate
veracity of our human Mind, we cannot even know that we know anything.
Mr. J. S. Mill accepts Mind as an inexplicable Fact underlying all
other Facts and Beliefs. We _must_ accept _ultimate_ Truths.
Transition to Chapter IV. on the affirmative evidence for our
Reasonable Beliefs.
Corollary on Materialism. Far more difficult than its antithesis.
Conclusion to be drawn from these difficulties.
_Additional Notes and Illustrations._
A.--Account of some theories respecting our Personal Identity.
B.--Helmholtz, Popular Lectures on Recent Progress of the Theory of
Vision.
C.--Helmholtz on Specialties of Sensibility.
D.--Popular account of Pure Idealism with critical remarks.
E.--On the Relations of Fact and Theory.
F.--On the "Unknowable."
G.--Mr. J. S. Mill as an Independent Moralist.
_Additions to Corollary._
Note H.--Archebiosis, or Spontaneous Generation. I.--On Materialism.
CHAPTER III.
CONDITIONS OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account