The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 1 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 1 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 1 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
It does not appear that the breach between the brothers was irreparable
until about 1535, in which year the King gave the childless Earl licence
to appoint any one of the Percy name and blood heir to all his
lands[120]. But when Sir Thomas, his natural successor, was proposed,
the King raised objections[121]. The result was that in February 1535
the Earl made the King his sole heir, and an Act of Parliament was
passed “concerning the assurance of the possessions of the Earl of
Northumberland to the King’s Highness and his heirs[122].” Nothing could
have made the Earl more unpopular, and it was probably this alienation
of the family property rather than his personal extravagance and
inherited debts that earned him his surname “the Unthrifty.”[123] Sir
Thomas was provided for in the Act, but he could hardly be grateful for
a pension when he felt himself heir by right to an earldom and the
broadest lands in the north[124]. No appeal was possible when the King
gained by his loss. A petition which he sent to Cromwell in July 1535
shows his helplessness. In this he related how the lands at Corbridge so
tardily allowed him, which he “with great labour” had defended from the
Scots, had now been granted by his brother to Sir Reynold Carnaby. Sir
Thomas naturally refused to give them up, and went to remonstrate with
his brother in person. But he was not allowed even to see the Earl and
was rudely turned from his house. He concluded by begging that Carnaby
might be removed from the Earl’s service, as he was the cause of his
master’s quarrels with his wife, brothers and nearest relatives[125].
Cromwell was not likely to remove Carnaby from the place where he had
been of so much use; and it was Cromwell and Carnaby whom Sir Thomas
secretly denounced as the authors of his wrongs when he, with Sir
Ingram, swore to be revenged on the Earl’s favourite as “the destruction
of all our blood.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account