The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 1 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 1 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
In 1534 the Earl of Cumberland accused Lord Dacre of high treason,
having seized his goods long before the trial. This was merely the last
move in a feud of some standing. Dacre was tried, but acquitted[132]. He
was the only nobleman acquitted on a charge of high treason during Henry
VIII’s reign; but he was heavily fined, which was presumably all that
the government wanted. It was, however, rather shortsighted policy, for
something between shame and suspicion prevented the King from employing
Dacre again. The Earl of Cumberland succeeded him in his office of
Warden of the Western Marches, but he was hampered in the execution of
his office both by his personal unpopularity and by the embittered feud
with the Dacres and their allies among the Cumberland gentlemen. The
Cliffords were the most powerful family on the western borders after the
disgrace of the Dacres. The Earl’s brother, Sir Thomas Clifford, was
deputy captain of Berwick-upon-Tweed[133]; the Earl’s illegitimate son
Thomas Clifford held the same office in Carlisle[134]. If the younger
Percys were in league with the mosstroopers of North Tynedale, so were
the Cliffords with the broken men of Esk and Line[135]. The thieves of
the Borders were used for or against the King simply as the noblemen who
bought their services pleased. It is necessary to bear this in mind in
order to understand the position not only of the King but also of his
opponents.
Southward from the Borders lay the county of Durham, always spoken of as
“the Bishopric.” For centuries it had enjoyed the privileges of a county
palatine within which the Bishop reigned supreme. But in 1535 all such
extraordinary jurisdictions were abolished, and Durham was reduced in
many respects to the rank of an ordinary shire[136]. Bishop Tunstall was
not a man who could in any circumstances have opposed such a King as
Henry VIII. He was timid, gentle and studious, and wins our affection by
the quiet persistence with which he refused to burn heretics. To their
shame be it said, his moderation irritated alike the Protestants and the
Romanists. He seems to have taken the change in his estate with perfect
equanimity, but the abolition of the ancient palatinate was resented by
the people of Durham, who had been used to pride themselves on their
position as “haliwerfolk,” the people of the holy man, St Cuthbert[137].
The Hiltons and the Lumleys were the principal families in Durham, and
their influence extended to the town of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, which,
lying on the north bank of the Tyne, was a county in itself. In the
south of Durham the chief gentlemen were Conyers of Hornby and Bowes of
Streatlam near Barnard Castle on the Tees.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account