The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
After despatching these letters from Hatfield, Norfolk must have gone to
Doncaster to meet the Pilgrims’ representatives. Sir Thomas Hilton and
his companions had received full instructions from the Pilgrims’
council. They were (1) “to declare to the Duke of Norfolk and other
lords that our meeting of our part is meant of assured truth without any
manner of deceit or ‘male ingyne’: (2) to receive the King’s
safe-conduct, and to deliver our safe-conduct for the assurance of the
lords there: (3) to entreat of our general pardon, including all persons
who in heart, word or deed aided the federation in this our quarrel, and
that we be not mentioned in the pardon, nor in any records as rebels and
traitors: (4) that Richard Cromwell nor none of his kind nor sort be at
our meeting at Doncaster: (5) to receive the King’s answer by the
declaration of the lords, and to certify the very intent thereof to us
here: (6) to know what authority the lords have to promise: (7) to
demand what pledge they would deliver for the captain: (8) if the
particulars are required, then to descend to divers particulars.”[50]
To all this Norfolk had no very truthful reply, particularly if it is
correct to suppose that he did not receive the King’s final instructions
until Wednesday. He could not honestly answer to (1) that he came to the
meeting “without any manner of deceit or ‘male ingyne,’” seeing that he
knew his object was to gain time until the King’s troops were ready to
make an attack. On that very day Suffolk was writing to ask for guns,
gunners, arrows, etc., saying that he was making musters and every day
expected the King’s two ships[51]. With regard to (2) Norfolk’s orders
were if possible to withhold the King’s safe-conduct and to persuade the
Pilgrims to come to the meeting on no security but his own word. He was
not authorised to promise a general pardon, as the King in his last
letters[52] had insisted that some of the rebels must be reserved for
punishment[53]. He could indeed satisfy them with regard to (4) as
Richard Cromwell had already withdrawn. But as to (5) he had particular
instructions not to reveal the King’s reply until the rebels had
submitted; and though he was to assure them that it was quite
satisfactory he must have known that this was far from being the case.
As to (6) he had no authority to promise anything but the limited
pardon, while he had been particularly forbidden to give a pledge for
Aske. Though he was permitted to go into particulars, it was only that
he might persuade the Pilgrims not to trouble the King with them, the
one point on which his orders were most emphatic being that he should
take every means to detach the gentlemen from the commons[54].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account