The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
When the Pilgrims came into the presence of the council, Aske made three
low obeisances. Then he and all his companions fell on their knees and
humbly begged for the King’s free pardon and gracious favour,
notwithstanding anything which they might have done contrary to the laws
of the land. These respectful preliminaries might have satisfied Henry,
but the subsequent proceedings did not follow the lines which he had
laid down, for without any representation of the King’s grievances they
passed immediately to the discussion of the articles. Here again Norfolk
seems to have disregarded the King’s desire for repeated delays. He had
obtained authority to grant a full and free pardon to all, and to
promise that the King would hold a free parliament; he thought, very
reasonably, that no good would result from disguising the fact, as the
more the negotiations were prolonged the wilder and more suspicious the
commons would become[60].
On this basis, therefore, the representatives of the King and of the
Pilgrims argued the particulars of the petition. About the first
article, for the suppression of heresy, no difficulty could be made[61].
The King was as anxious for this as his subjects, and the arrest of
several heretics had already created a good impression[62]. Norfolk at
this point could use with some effect a passage in the King’s answer to
the men of Yorkshire in which he promised to punish any members of his
council or others, who could be proved to be subverters of the law, and
he would be free to suppress the King’s addition that nobody would be
able to prove such a thing[63]. The King’s circular to the bishops was
well received. In it the bishops were ordered “to commend all the honest
ceremonies of the Church in such wise that they be not contemned,” and
were forbidden to retain in their service any person who spoke of the
ceremonies “contentiously or contemptuously.”[64] They were to watch the
preachers vigilantly, and silence any who were indiscreet, even if they
had the King’s licence, and they were to seek out and apprehend any
priests “who have presumed to marry.” Darcy afterwards forwarded a copy
of this letter to Lee, saying that in it “all true Catholics may
joy.”[65] The rest of the articles dealing with religion might all be
referred to the coming parliament. The royal supremacy, the tenths and
first-fruits, and the rest had all been granted by act of parliament. It
would be highly unconstitutional for the King to annul them merely on
his own authority, but what one parliament had done another could undo.
It seems that the Pilgrims assented to this, in all but one point. They
insisted, however, that the suppressed abbeys must be allowed to stand
until their case had been brought before parliament again. Norfolk had
no power to grant this, but the Pilgrims firmly refused to give it up.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account