Detective and mystery stories; London (England) -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
Audrey's evidence was confined to the fact that her mother had taken
the two thousand pounds' worth of diamonds to get certain of them
reset. She had intended to take them straight to the jeweller, but
having arranged to consult with Madame Coralie, and subsequently to
remain for the night, she had taken the bag out of the motorcar and
into the house. The label produced was in her mother's handwriting,
and Audrey stated Lady Branwin's fancy for labelling anything she took
out of doors.
On the whole, as the Coroner remarked, the evidence was satisfactory.
If it did not prove who had committed the murder, it certainly
exonerated all who were in the house. It had been proved that
Madame Coralie and her four assistants slept in two rooms which opened
into one another, and also that Madame herself had been with other
people at the very time when the crime--according to the medical
evidence--had been committed. Undoubtedly, robbery was the motive for
the committal of the crime, and probably the strangling had been
unpremeditated. Lady Branwin--this was the Coroner's reading of what
had happened--had gone to sleep with the diamonds under her pillow, as
Madame Coralie had stated. It was only reasonable to believe that she
had awakened to find the robber removing the jewels. Her natural
outcry was prevented immediately by the strangulation, since the
assassin--as the man had become--could silence her in no other way.
Then the criminal had escaped by the window through which he had
entered, and through the door of the court wall. The dropping of the
label, which possibly had been loosely tied to the bag, was a positive
clue to the way in which the man had got away, and the presence of the
skeleton key in the door was further evidence. These things being
taken into consideration, it was apparent that no blame could be
attached to Madame Coralie or to her assistants, and there was not the
slightest breath of suspicion against them in any way. "The jury,"
added the Coroner, "would be well advised to return an open verdict."
The result of this speech, and a recollection of the meagre evidence
placed before them, was the verdict which Ralph Shawe had predicted.
"Wilful murder against some person or persons unknown," was the
statement of the foreman, and the inquest ended with the belief in
many minds that the murder of Lady Branwin would have to be added to
the already long list of undiscovered crimes. Chattering and arguing,
and greatly disappointed that nothing more tangible had resulted from
the proceedings, everyone went his or her way, and the reporters
hastened to their several papers with details, more or less veracious,
of all that had taken place. But one fact was certain--that the
murder, so far, was a mystery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account