The popular description of Orpheus as founder of the Orphists must be
taken for what it is worth. The sect may have either evolved or borrowed
the legend. Christianity itself appropriated the myth of Orpheus,
pictorially, at least, in those rude tracings in the Roman catacombs
showing the Good Shepherd in that character, which inspired Carlyle to
write one of the most impassioned passages in English prose. The sweet
lute-player who held entranced lion and lamb till the one forgot his
wrath and the other his fear, was the natural symbol of the prototype of
a humane religion.
Out of the nebulous patches of Greek enthusiasts who cherished tender
feelings towards animals, emerges the intellectual sun of the Samian
sage. It is difficult not to connect Pythagoras in some way with the
Orphists, nor would such a connexion make it the less probable that he
journeyed to the sacred East in search of fuller knowledge. Little,
indeed, do we know about this moulder of minds. He passed across the
world’s stage dark “with excess of light”—an influence rather than a
personality. Yet he was as far as possible from being only a dreamer of
dreams; he was the Newton, the Galileo, perhaps the Edison and Marconi
of his epoch. And it was this double character of moral teacher and man
of science which caused the extraordinary reverence with which he was
regarded. Science and religion were not divorced then; the Prophet could
present no credentials so valid as an understanding of the laws which
govern the universe. Mathematics and astronomy were revelations of
divine truth. It was the scientific insight of Pythagoras, the wonderful
range and depth of which is borne out more and more by modern
discoveries, that lent supreme importance to whatever theories he was
known to have held. The doctrine of transmigration had not been treated
seriously while it was only preached by the Orphists, but after it was
adopted by Pythagoras it commanded a wide attention, though it never won
a large acceptance. One expounder it had, who was too remarkable an
original thinker to be called a mere disciple—the greatly-gifted
Empedocles, who denounced the eaters of flesh as no better than
cannibals, which was going further than Pythagoras himself had ever
gone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account