The distinguishing qualification given him of _good and laborious_ is
the most striking proof of the originality of Magian ideas: instead of
the strong bulls of Basan roaring in their might, the bull we have here
is one with the ploughing ox:—
“T’amo, o pio bove; e mite un sentimento
Di vigore e di pace al cor m’infondi....”
—the patient, the long-suffering, the gentle, though strong-limbed
helper of man in his daily toil, good in his vigour, good in his
mildness, but good most of all in his labour, for Zoroaster called
labour a holy thing. The animal which did most to cultivate God’s earth
and make the desert flower like a rose, was the paragon of creatures. It
must not be thought that to the Geus Urva or his kind was ever rendered
the homage due to their Creator. If there was one thing more abhorrent,
to the Zoroastrian mind than idolatry it was zoolatry: when Cambyses
killed a new Apis with many of his followers in Egypt, he had no reason
to fear Mazdean criticism.
The soul of the bull receives _dulia_ not _latria_. “We honour the soul
of the bull ... and also our own souls and our cattle’s souls who help
to preserve our life; the souls by which they exist and which exist for
them.” So runs one of the Gâthâs, one of the hymns of Zoroaster himself.
“We honour the souls of the swift, wild animals; we honour the souls of
just men and women in whatever place they are born, whose pure natures
have overcome evil. We honour saintly men and saintly women, living
immortal, always living, always increasing in glory—all man and woman
souls faithful to the Spirit of God.”
In this song of praise we have brought before us vividly a fundamental
doctrine of the Avesta which pervades every page of it: the belief in
the Fravashi, the soul-partner, the double or angel, which exists before
birth as during life and after death. This belief has a great interest
for us as it would seem that it was only by chance that it did not pass
into the body of Christian dogma. The Jews of the new school had held it
for quite two hundred years before Christ. Besides other allusions, are
the three distinct references to the soul-partner in the New Testament.
Christ Himself speaks of the angels of the children who are always in
the presence of God and who complain to Him if the children are
ill-treated. Secondly, when Peter issued from prison, those who saw him
said, “It is his angel.” Thirdly, it is stated that the Sadducees
believed that there was no resurrection, “neither angel nor Spirit,” but
that the Pharisees, of whom Paul was one, “confessed both.” These three
references become intelligible for the first time after reading the
Gâthâs. True it is that he who knows only one religion, knows none.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account