The place of magic in the intellectual history of EuropeThorndike, Lynn
History
The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- Europe -- History
Science and magic are very unlike, but even the distinction between East
and West varies according to where the speaker takes his stand. We have
come to regard science as abstract truth, scientific investigation as
necessarily correct and sensible; we forget that science has a past. In
their actual history science and magic were not unassociated. Scientists
might accept magical doctrines and magic might endeavor to classify its
fancies and to account for them by natural causes. Roger Bacon could
regard the attainment of magical results as the great end of
experimental science. Francis Bacon could place magic in the same
category with metaphysics and physics.
It is with this mingling of magic and science—or more broadly of magic
with learning in general—in the history of our Western world that this
essay has to do. It is a theme of no narrow interest. Such ideas as have
been cited, not only held by the most learned men of the times but
incorporated in their scientific and philosophical systems—in so far as
they had any—deserve consideration in the history of science and
philosophy as well as in that of magic, or in an investigation of the
mental make-up of the men of the past.
While, however, the place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
is our general subject, the present essay is far from being an attempt
at a complete treatment of it. The aim is rather to illustrate that
theme by a survey of learning during the period of the Roman Empire,
when the divers threads of the thought and knowledge of the ancient
world were to some extent united. The prominence of magic in mediæval
science is perhaps better known and more generally admitted. Accordingly
this essay will take for granted, except in so far as it has been
illustrated in our first chapter, the presence of magic in mediæval
learning, and will try to show that magical doctrines, credulity,
mysticism, and love of the marvelous were not traits peculiar to
mediæval thought, but that in this respect (as in others) there was
close resemblance, probably strict continuity between the Roman world
and later times. It was largely in order to bring out this resemblance,
continuity and influence that the beliefs of various writers in the
Middle Ages and early modern times were given in the first chapter. Let
the reader compare them with those notions of men in the Roman Empire
which will presently be set forth. If we are justified in thus regarding
the Roman world as summarizing ancient science and helping to explain
mediæval thought, we evidently, in taking our stand in that period
secure a broad prospect and ought to obtain a fair idea of the place of
magic in the intellectual history of Europe. In defining the field which
we are to cover, it should be further said that Christian thought will
not come into our discussion, since it did not greatly influence science
and other secular learning until the close of the Roman Empire. Lastly,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account