The place of magic in the intellectual history of EuropeThorndike, Lynn
History
The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- Europe -- History
Moreover, magi or magicians deal with the inhuman, the obscene and the
abominable. Osthanes, and even the philosopher Democritus, are led by
their devotion to magic into propounding such remedies as drinking human
blood or utilizing in magic compounds or ceremonies portions of the
corpses of men violently slain.[73] Magic is a malicious and criminal
art. Its devotees attempt the transfer of disease from one person to
another or the exercise of baleful sorcery.[74] “It cannot be
sufficiently estimated how great a debt is due the Romans who did away
with those monstrous rites in which to slay a man was most pious; nay
more, to eat men most wholesome.”[75] In fine, we may rest persuaded
that magic is “execrable, ineffectual and inane.” Yet it possesses some
shadow of truth, but is of avail through “veneficas artes ... non
magicas,”[76] whatever that distinction may be.
III. _Illustrations of Pliny’s fundamental belief in magic._—Pliny, we
have seen, made a bold pretense of utter disbelief in magic, and also
censured the art on grounds of decency, morality and humanity. Yet
despite this wholesale condemnation, in some places in his work it is
difficult to tell where his quotations from magicians cease and where
statements which he accepts recommence. Sometimes he explicitly quoted
theories or facts from the writings of the “magi” without censure and
without any expression of disbelief. If it is contended that he none the
less regarded them as false and worthless, we may fairly ask, why then
did he give them such a prominent place in his encyclopedia? Surely we
must conclude either that he really had a liking for them himself and
more than half believed them, or that previous works on nature were so
full of such material and his own age so interested in such data that he
could not but include much of this lore. Probably both alternatives are
true. Finally, many things which Pliny states without any reference to
the magi seem as false and absurd as the far-fetched assertions which he
attributes to them and for which he shows so much scorn. Indeed, it
hardly seems paradoxical to say that he hated the magi but liked their
doctrines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account