The place of magic in the intellectual history of EuropeThorndike, Lynn
History
The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- Europe -- History
There were occasional imperial edicts against astrologers, it is true,
and even sporadic persecution of them. But the explanation of such
measures is belief, not scepticism, and they denote not disbelief in the
art itself but disapproval of the use to which it was put—such as
revealing the fate of the present and the name of the coming ruler.
Almost every emperor had an astrologer at his court, and the historians
of the period delighted in telling stories of astrologers who foretold
their own deaths, or of monarchs who in vain attempted to thwart the
decrees of fate.[150] Alexander Severus is said to have founded chairs
of astrology salaried by the state and with provision for scholarships
for students.[151] Occasional persecution perhaps made the _mathematici_
more highly valued, and the jibes of the satirists against astrologers
and their followers attest rather than disprove the popularity of the
art. Pliny the Elder and Tacitus asserted its great currency.[152]
The best science of the Empire reflected to a considerable extent these
superstitions sanctioned by public opinion, as our discussion of Seneca
and Ptolemy will indicate in some detail. For the present we may observe
how the great Galen—whose authority reduced to a single school the many
quarreling medical sects of his day, was later implicitly accepted by
the Arabs, and then dominated European medicine to the time of
Paracelsus—was not above astrological medicine or the use of fantastical
remedies. He displayed trust in amulets and believed that such things as
the ashes of frogs or “hippocampi” have remedial power.[153] He held
that the critical days of disease are largely influenced by the moon,
and affirmed that we receive “the force of all the stars above.”[154] It
should be noted moreover that in one passage, in giving expression to
his zeal for astronomy as the handmaid of the healing art, Galen accused
many physicians of paying no attention to the stars. But he asserted
that in this neglect they were no true followers of the great
Hippocrates, whom they extolled but never imitated, for Hippocrates had
maintained that astronomy had no small bearing on the art of the
physician and that geometry was its indispensable precursor.[155]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account