The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe — John Shaqi
The place of magic in the intellectual history of EuropeThorndike, Lynn
History
The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- Europe -- History
Philo carried allegorical interpretation to an absurd extreme even if he
did not go quite so far as Reuchlin and Agrippa. Not only did he make
such assertions as that by Hagar was typified “encyclical education,”
that Ishmael was her “sophist son,” and that Sarah stood for “the ruling
virtue,”[162] but in general he tried to read into the Old Testament all
the doctrines of Greek philosophy and science. He declared that all
knowledge, whether in religion, philosophy or natural science, might be
acquired by allegorical interpretation of the Pentateuch. Now we can say
without manifesting any semblance of irreverence towards true religion,
that to endeavor to gain from the books of the Old Testament—especially
by the methods which Philo employed—either the key to all philosophy or
adequate knowledge of natural science and extensive control of the
forces of nature, would, if possible, be as marvelous a feat, and is as
fallacious and fantastic a proceeding, as to try to coin gold from
copper, or to learn the future from the stars, or even to obtain a
solution of the problems of philosophy and a knowledge and control of
nature by invoking demons to instruct and to assist you. The very notion
that some man like Moses a thousand or more years ago had at his command
all the knowledge that can ever be got is magical itself. Moses must
have been a magician to know so much. Philo, moreover, if he did not
believe in a magic power of words, at least showed that they seemed to
him to have a most extraordinary significance. In his treatise, _De
Mutatione Nominum_, he relates with great unction the just punishment of
hanging which overtook an impious scoffer who derided the notion that
the change in the names of Abraham and of Sarah had any profound
meaning.[163] As one would naturally expect from what has been said
about Philo thus far, he regarded knowledge as something sacred and
esoteric. In his writings he liked to talk of mysteries and to request
the uninitiated to withdraw. This attitude, while in itself not exactly
magic, is, as has been already suggested, the product of a mind attuned
to magic. Finally, Philo, following Pythagoras, attached great
significance to numbers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account