The place of magic in the intellectual history of EuropeThorndike, Lynn
History
The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- Europe -- History
The belief that one’s future could be learned by observing the stars was
equally widespread. Astrologers throve at the courts of kings, and
sometimes their advice was taken even by him whose every act was held to
be under special divine direction. It would be a great mistake to think
that the astrologer was maintained merely for the amusement of king and
court, like the jester. His utterances were taken most seriously, and
the principles of his art were so generally accepted as to become the
commonplaces of the thought and the conversation of daily life. In 1305,
for instance, when certain cardinals urged Pope Clement V to return to
Rome, they reminded him that every planet was most powerful in its own
house.[1] Indeed, even in our speech to-day numerous vestiges of the
astrological art survive.[2]
Moreover, a grander and more imposing witchcraft displayed itself in the
stories of the wizard Merlin and in the persons of the wicked magicians
with whom knights contended in the pages of mediæval romance. So strong
was the tendency to believe in the marvelous, that men of learning were
often pictured by subsequent tradition, if not by contemporary gossip,
as mighty necromancers. Even Gerbert, who seems to have done nothing
more shocking than to write a treatise on the abacus and build a
pipe-organ, was pictured as running off with a magician’s book and
daughter, hanging under bridges between earth and water to escape
noxious spells, and making compacts with Satan.[3]
The attitude of the average mind as it has just been illustrated was to
a large extent characteristic of the best instructed and most widely
read men. The erudite poet Dante accepted the influence of the
constellations upon human destiny. Bodin maintained in his
_Republic_—perhaps the greatest book on political science written during
the sixteenth century—that astrology was very useful in tracing the
development of society.[4] Aquinas, chief of the mediæval theologians,
accepted astrological theory, except as limited by human free will, and
further admitted that most men make little use of their liberty of
action but blindly follow their passions, which are governed by the
stars.[5] Among other great mediæval churchmen and canonists, d’Ailly
and Gerson both believed that God signified important events in advance
through the stars, and d’Ailly made some astrological predictions
himself. Astrology was much taught in the mediæval universities,[6] and
was regarded as the climax of mathematics and as an essential part of
medicine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account