The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, and Other EssaysVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, and Other Essays
Veblen, Thorstein
Economics; Science
In a more painstaking statement of this point of theory it would be
necessary to note that these gains are "timeless," in the sense
indicated, in so far as the enterprise from which they accrue is
dissociated from the technological circumstances and processes of
industry, and only in so far. Technological (industrial) procedure,
being of the nature of physical causation, is subject to the time
relation under which causal sequence runs. This is the basis of such
discussions of capital and interest as those of Boehm-Bawerk, and of
Fisher. But business traffic, as distinguished from the processes of
industry, being not immediately concerned with the technological
process, is also not immediately or uniformly subject to the time
relation involved in the causal sequence of the technological process.
Business traffic is subject to the time relation because and in so far
as it depends upon and follows up the processes of production. The
commonplace or old-fashioned business enterprise, the competitive system
of investment in industrial business simply, commonly rests pretty
directly on the due sequence of the industrial processes in which the
investments of such enterprise are placed. Such enterprise, as conceived
by the current theories of capital, does business at first hand in the
industrial efficiency of the community, which is conditioned by the time
relation of the causal sequence, and which is, indeed, in great measure
a function of the time consumed in the technological processes.
Therefore, the gains, as well as the transactions, of such enterprise
are also commonly somewhat closely conditioned by the like time
relation, and they typically emerge under the form of a per-cent. per
time unit; that is to say, as a function of the lapse of time. Yet the
business transactions themselves are not a matter of the lapse of time.
Time is not of the essence of the case. The magnitude of a pecuniary
transaction is not a function of the time consumed in concluding it, nor
are the gains which accrue from the transaction. In business enterprise
on the higher plane, which is here under inquiry, the relation of the
transactions, and of their gains, to the consecution of the
technological processes remotely underlying them is distant, loose, and
uncertain, so that the time element here does not obtrude itself:
rather, it somewhat obviously falls into abeyance, marking the degree of
its remoteness. Yet this phase of business enterprise, like any other,
of course takes place in time; and, it is also to be remarked, the
volume of the traffic and the gains derived from it are, no doubt,
somewhat closely conditioned in the long run by the time relation which
dominates that technological (industrial) efficiency on which this
enterprise, too, ultimately and indirectly rests and from which in the
last resort its gains are finally drawn, however remotely and
indirectly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account