The Plague of Lust, Vol. 1 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 1 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
[382] _Synesii_ Episcopi Cyrenes Opera quae extant omnia, interprete
Dionysio Petavio—codicum fide recensita ac notis illustrata et eodem
modo omnia _secunda_ hac _editione_ multo accuratiora et uberiora
prodeunt. Lutetiae Parisiorum 1633. fol. p. 25. A. Ὡς Ὅμηρός φησι
τοὺς θεοὺς Ἀνθρώπων ὕβριν τε καὶ εὐνομίαν ἐφέποντες Σκύθας δὲ
τούτους, Ἡρόδοτός τέ φησι, καὶ ἡμεῖς ὁρῶμεν, κατεχομένους ἅπαντας
ὑπὸ _νόσον θηλείας_· οὗτοι γάρ εἰσιν, ἀφ’ ὧν οἱ πανταχοῦ δοῦλοι κ.
τ. λ. _Synesius_ Bishop of Cyrené, Complete Works so far as Extant.
edit. Dionysius Petavius; text revised and compared with MSS., and
illustrated with explanatory notes; the whole re-issued in a more
accurate and fuller form in this Second Edition. Paris 1633. fol., p.
25. A., “As Homer—Odyssey XVII. 487—says of the gods, visiting the
insolence and good government of men; but these Scythians Herodotus
declares, and we see the fact for ourselves, to be all fallen under the
feminine disease; and it is they from whom come as a rule the slaves,
etc.” The word θηλείας in the edition mentioned stands in text; and in
the margin as γρ. δειλίας.
[383] Pyrrh. Hypotyp., bk. III. ch. 199., Νενόμισται τὸ τῆς
_ἀῤῥενομιξίας παρὰ Γερμανοῖς_ ὥς φασιν οὐκ αἰσχρὸν ἀλλ’ ὡς ἕν τι
τῶν συνηθῶν (But the practice of intercourse with males is not among
the Germans, so they say, reckoned a shameful thing, but as one of
the customary acts)—_Aristotle_, Polit. II. 6. 6., _Strabo_, Geogr.,
IV. 199. _Diodorus_, Bibl. V. 32. _Athenaeus_, Deipn., p. 603 a.,
relate the same thing of the Celts. _Quintilian_ who lived about 42
after Christ, directly denies the fact, it is true: Declam. 3, Nihil
tale _novere_ Germani et sanctius vivitur ad Oceanum. Non sit mihi
forsitan quaerendum aversis auribus saeculi huius in tantum vitia
regnare, ut obscoenis cupiditatibus natura cesserit, ut pollutis in
_femineam_ usque _patientiam_ maribus incurrat iam libido in sexum
suum, finem tamen aliquem sibi vitia ipsa exceperunt, ultimumque adhuc
huius flagitii crimen fuit corrupisse futurum virum. Hoc vero cuius
est dementiae? In concubinatum iuniores leguntur, et in _muliebrem
patientiam vocatur_ fortasse iam maritus. (The _Germans_ know no such
practice; for life is purer near the Ocean. Would it were possible
to shut my ears to the fact that Vice in this age prevails to such a
degree that Nature has had to yield to foul lusts, that men corrupted
even to the length of _suffering themselves to be treated as women_
are filled with lust towards their own sex; yet vice itself set some
limit to its own excesses, and the last extremity of this lewdness was
to have ruined one that might have grown into a man. But what a height
of insanity is here! Young men are chosen as mistresses, and a man _is
called upon to endure the treatment proper to a woman_.) Who can fail
to see that in this passage the words _feminea patientia_, _muliebris
patientia_, are given as a translation of νοῦσος θήλεια?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account